Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...)
From: Kris Craig Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 07:26:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...) References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-74330@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> > Can't we simply talk of 2/3 to avoid any confusion? > Agreed, especially considering that even 66.66% is technically inaccurate, as is 66.66666666666%. It would be nice if the various character encodings supported a repetend symbol somehow, but since they don't, 2/3 is really the only sane way to express the requirement accurately. --Kris
Thread (87 messages)
- RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer
- Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer
- Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer
- Re: [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer
| « previous | php.internals (#74330) | next » |
|---|