On 20 July 2014 16:44, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 07:24, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:34 PM, David Soria Parra <dsp@php.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Sounds very good and 0.8% overhead is fine. Can we work on getting this
>> > integrated into a v2 of the RFC, continue hopefully constructive
>> discussions for
>> > a week or two and then vote again. We aren't in a rush at the moment as
>> > php.next is far away.
>>
>> That sounds like a good reason to restart, the ML issues are good
>> reasons to begin it again (sigh). However I am not even sure the
>> issues are fixed by now... No activity on systems lately.
>>
>
> This RFC is still listed as “in voting” on the wiki. What is its current
> state?
>
Bump.
Still listed as being in voting phase, and votes are still open.