0

Introduction

Legendary development refers to accounts that are expanded or made grander over time. These developments are often in areas of a story where there is intense interest in further details.

As an example, the 2nd Century Gospel of Peter contains legendary development around the resurrection itself. The canonical gospels do not contain any information about what happened during the resurrection, only that it occurred. Peter relates how there were actually hundreds of people standing outside the tomb and witnessed Jesus physically exiting, with the crucifixion cross following him out:

...and they marked it with seven wax seals; and having pitched a tent there, they safeguarded it. 34 But early when the Sabbath was dawning, a crowd came from Jerusalem and the surrounding area in order that they might see the sealed tomb.

35 But in the night in which the Lord's day dawned, when the soldiers were safeguarding it two by two in every watch, there was a loud voice in heaven; 36 and they saw that the heavens were opened and that two males who had much radiance had come down from there and come near the sepulcher. 37 But that stone which had been thrust against the door, having rolled by itself, went a distance off the side; and the sepulcher opened, and both the young men entered. 38 And so those soldiers, having seen, awakened the centurion and the elders (for they too were present, safeguarding). 39 And while they were relating what they had seen, again they see three males who have come out from they sepulcher, with the two supporting the other one and a cross following them, 40 and the head of the two reaching unto heaven, but that of the one being led out by a hand by them going beyond the heavens. 41 And they were hearing a voice from the heavens saying, 'Have you made proclamation to the fallen-asleep?' 42 And an obeisance was heard from the cross, 'Yes.'

This story expands the resurrection story: adding witnesses, fantastical elements like a walking cross and giants, and elaborating on a part of Jesus's story that was previously unknown.

Luke's Ascension

The Gospel of Luke is the only canonical gospel that contains an account of Jesus's final moments on Earth, known as "The Ascension".

50 When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. 52 Then they worshiped him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy. 53 And they stayed continually at the temple, praising God.

The account is repeated and details added in Acts of the Apostles, also written by the author of Luke.

9 When he had said this, as they were watching, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight. 10 While he was going and they were gazing up toward heaven, suddenly two men in white robes stood by them. 11 They said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking up toward heaven? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.”

The Lukan story contains witnesses to the ascension, fantastic elements such as Jesus floating upwards to the heavens (indicating a cosmology where the Heavenly abode is in/above the sky), and elaborates on a question that early Christians were certainly asking themselves: Where did Jesus go after he was resurrected?

Question:

Does the Lukan Ascension contain legendary development? Is the ascension comparable to the Gospel of Peter's resurrection account?

Improve this question
5
  • 1
    Yes, but sometimes that's how God works. Or at least, it's how mythic elements are included in religious narratives and then become part of what people think of as history. The story of Moses is another case in point. Like King Arthur, legends were attracted to him. Commented Mar 12, 2025 at 4:44
  • @DanFefferman great point - you could see a ton of literary parallels between King David and Arthur Commented Mar 12, 2025 at 14:02
  • 3
    This question is founded on the basis of drawing a false parallel between a canonical book and an apocryphal book. One denies both the bodily death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, while being written by an unknow author falsely attributing it to the apostle. The other is based on actual eye witness accounts and also agrees with other Scripture (both authors of the Gospels) on the manner of Jesus's return (Matt 26:64, Rev 1:7). Commented Nov 12, 2025 at 6:04
  • 1
    Legendary storytelling often carries the intent to captivate audiences for personal gain - whether through fame, influence, or financial profit. especially in modern context. In contrast, the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles were addressed to a single person, Theophilus, suggesting a different motivation. It is unlikely that these writings were crafted with public acclaim in mind. Instead, greater caution is warranted for texts composed after the passing of the original eyewitnesses, as their content becomes increasingly difficult to authenticate or challenge. Commented Nov 12, 2025 at 20:30
  • Important Research It is beneficial for a question such as this to arise occasionally and be addressed so that the "Reliability of the N.T." can be researched and affirmed. The "integrity" of this ancient document needs to be shown every so often to be grounded in historicity, and in veracity. The answers here confirm this Sacred Book. +1 Commented Nov 16, 2025 at 22:36

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

Does Luke's Account Show Evidence of Legendary Development?

Absolutely Not
The Ascension of Jesus is one of the fundamental beliefs of Christianity. He ascended to the throne of God. And from there Jesus intercedes for the Christians in His Church.

This rendition of Luke contains no more "fantastic elements" than the other miraculous events during Jesus's Incarnation on Earth. (1) Walking on water, (2) raising the dead, (3) Multiplying food enough for 5,000 people! (4) Turning leprous skin to cleanliness, etc.

Only Accounts
Recall that each of the Gospels contain stories in the life of Christ that the other Gospels don't relate! Some incidents are unique to that one Gospel. But these occurrences do not in any way undermine the credibility of the Gospel narrative. Nor should they be considered added on embellishments or legendary developments.

Communal Verification
If this relating by Luke was a legendary embellishment, the Early Church teachers (and theologians) would have noticed it and refuted it. But rather, they rejoiced in this event as told by Luke. Peter and Paul built their theses upon this Ascension as told by Luke. Note that the timing of the composition of Luke's two History books does not allow for the length of time necessary for legends to develop.

To compare King Arthur's legends with the historical documents of Luke is unworthy of any scholar's consideration!

Luke's Credibility
Much research has been done by New Testament scholars and literary linguists. They have found that Luke's listing of rulers, place names, historical events, etc. were beyond suspicion, and quite accurate. For example, see St. Paul, the Traveler by Sir William Ramsey. Also Is the New Testament Reliable by F.F. Bruce.

Legendary development? Evidence shows quite the contrary!

Resources
Gary Habermas, The Verdict of History
Josh McDowell, He Walked Among Us
Wilbur Smith, Therefore Stand
Simon Greenleaf, The Testimony of the Evangelists
Steven Collins, Championing the Faith
John A.T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament
Sir William Ramsey, The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the N.T.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Excellent answer. The reliability of the New Testament is peerless among ancient writings, which is accounted by an author of one of your resources, Josh McDowell, in Evidence that Demand a Verdict. Commented Nov 16, 2025 at 10:29
  • 1
    *Mimi-Yes, verily! There are more manuscripts and closer to the original for the Bible, than for the writings of Socrates, Homer, Cicero, etc. , and yet the modern academics accept the Greeks and Romans without question, and doubt the Sacred Book. Go figure! Commented Nov 16, 2025 at 22:42

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.