1

The Lamb breaks the seals one by one, which permits or releases different things to occur.

“Now I watched when the Lamb opened one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures say with a voice like thunder, “Come!” And I looked, and behold, a white horse! And its rider had a bow, and a crown was given to him, and he came out conquering, and to conquer.” ‭‭Revelation‬ ‭6‬:‭1‬-‭2‬ ‭ESV‬‬

“When he opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature say, “Come!” And out came another horse, bright red. Its rider was permitted to take peace from the earth, so that people should slay one another, and he was given a great sword.” ‭‭Revelation‬ ‭6‬:‭3‬-‭4‬ ‭ESV‬‬

The first horseman is interpreted by some to be the AntiChrist. If so, it would appear that his appearance is restrained by the first seal. When the Lamb breaks the seal, God’s restraint - the instrument of His will restraining Satan, which could be an angel (like Michael in Daniel) or even His direct power (like the hedge of fire around Job that restrained Satan) is taken out of the way.

Does this fit the language in 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7? The what restraining being the unbroken seal and the who being the instrument of God’s will - His sovereign decree behind the seal?

New contributor
Zesty is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
  • 1
    There's no consensus on what the white horse and its rider represent. Revelation 6 says only that the first rider was given (edothē in Greek) a crown and victoriously conquered, the second rider was given a great sword to take peace from the earth, the third rider held a pair of scales (a voice quoted extremely high prices for food), and the fourth rider, named Death, was given authority to kill a quarter of humanity with a double-handed sword, famine, plague, and wild animals. Three more seals in the scroll that the Lion/Lamb took from God's right hand are then broken by the Lamb. Commented yesterday

2 Answers 2

1

It is a solemn thing to say that the rider on the first, white, horse in Revelation 6:2 is the anti-Christ, for if it turns out to be Christ on that white horse, then blasphemy will have been uttered. The question here simply says, "The first horseman is interpreted by some to be the AntiChrist".

As that sentence is fundamental to exploring the understanding, and whether another text, 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7, supports the OP wondering if the breaking open of the first seal permits the anti-Christ to ride forth on that first, white horse, the Revelation text requires examination. To do that, let it first be pointed out that Revelation chapters 4 to 6 mark the second section of the entire book. (There are 7 sections in total.) Those chapters begin to open up how the risen Christ alone is able to break the 7 seals of the book in the hand of the Almighty, leading to his glorious return as heir of the world, occupying the throne of world dominion that The anti-Christ is trying to usurp. Now follows quotes from a 600+ page exposition of the book of Revelation, dealing with the opening of that first seal:

"The book of God's rights on his terms to all Creation remains to mankind as if it were permanently sealed... When the Lamb took the book from the right hand of him that sat upon the throne there was an immediate and overwhelming response not only from the redeemed but from the Creation itself. For the issue is the Creation. The book relates to the sole rights of the Creator to the inheritance of the earth, despite the kingdoms of this world in contest for the throne of world dominion.

And, in sequence, a horse and rider appear. These are the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, unique to the first four seals. Here is a going forth from heaven to the earth of that which is of God. And to what end? To reveal to a blind, fallen and rebellious world, and its rulers and nations, that 'The earth is the Lord's and the fulness thereof'. Moreover, that what the world regards as the 'normality' of its divorce from the throne in the heavens, and from him that sits upon it, is intolerable to the Almighty. He will establish his Anointed upon the throne of world dominion to inherit the earth, and the mysterious horsemen begin to show how he will do so... [Then Zechariah's vision in 520 B.C. is examined, re. horses and four chariots he saw, signifying divine powers, then back to Revelation 6:1-2]

The first horse was white. White is indicative of purity: Matthew 17:2, Luke 9:29, 'his raiment was white and glistening.' That is pure white. Cleanliness and purity are combined in the vision of the Ancient of days, Daniel 7:9... White is also indicative of righteousness. The Lamb's wife, Revelation 19:8, was granted to be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: 'for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.' Once ,ore, righteousness is combined with judgment, Revelation 15:6 'The seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues. clothed in pure and white linen.'

So that a white horse would convey concepts judgment, righteousness, cleanliness, and purity. 'And he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him; and he went forth conquering and to conquer.' But first, if the rider sat upon a horse conveying such a character, that character must suit the rider.

If so, the rider is Christ. But Christ as fulfilling a certain office. He has a bow. Yet no mention is made of arrows. Here is a mystery. It is warfare but not with carnal weapons. There is an indication of the instruments of war, but a withholding of their being used in violence. There is no worldly application. It is war, but it is spiritual war.

A crown was given unto him. Then he must be a King. And if a King, then of a kingdom. But, saith he, 'My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is y kingdom not from hence', John 18:36. The crowned rider on the white horse depicts Christ in his progress through time, going forward in his glorious majesty, unseen by the world, but worshipped in the kingdom.

The rider is Christ, but Christ in this distinct office of King over the kingdom. He is invisibly and secretly bringing in his kingdom in such a way that the world does not even know what is happening. Throughout time he rides gloriously, he triumphs in majesty...

There are two words for crown in Greek. One is stephanos. This is that spoken of in Revelation 6:2... It's the same in Revelation 14:14, 'And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.' Here is the same rider, the King, having reached the conclusion of his ride, and, as Son of man, ready to thrust in the sickle and reap the harvest of the earth in the Last Judgment." The Revelation of Jesus Christ, John Metcalfe, pp. 116, 145-6, 152-4, 1998, republished 2022, http://www.johnmetcalfepublishingtrust.co.uk/contact_us.htm

Having explored the meaning of Revelation 6:2, comparing it with related texts, the blasphemous idea that the rider is The anti-Christ has been exposed. This means that there is no need to then see if 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7 applies. It cannot, for the rider on the white horse is Christ Jesus, setting forth to spiritually conquer but without violent force, his triumphant ride ending in Revelation 14:14 when he returns as the rightful King, in judgment.

3
  • Geez what nonsense. You can’t accidentally blaspheme by misidentifying a figurative image in Revelation incorrectly. Otherwise, one could also equally be blaspheming if they were to incorrectly interpret the Antichrist as Christ - as you might very well be doing. FYI, the interpretation of the rider on the white horse being the Antichrist comes from the McArthur Commentary by John McArthur. Perhaps your interpretation is correct or perhaps it isn’t, but you are certainly wrong about the interpretation being blasphemy. See John‬ ‭1‬:‭46‬-‭47 Commented yesterday
  • 1
    Anne, in Zechariah 6, there are four chariots with multiple horses each. No mention is made of riders in the chariots. The colors of the eight or more horses pulling the four chariots are (in order) red, black, white, and spotted. They are identified as the four spirits of heaven, and they are sent to patrol the North and South. The ones sent to the North are sent to appease God's wrath. The color of the fourth horse in Revelation 6 is chloros, pale green, and there's no mention of chariots. Commented yesterday
  • @Dieter Yes, the quote does say 4 chariots. Yes, there are many differences, but certain foreshadowing points link Zechariah with Revelation. It takes the author 5 pages to explain that, but as the Q here is only about the Revelation horses, I did not go into that. Likewise with Daniel's visions of 4 beasts; it requires Revelation to add to it, to give the complete understanding of where Daniel's vision stops and the Revelation ones resume. But it's enough here to stick with who rides the white horse of Rev.6:2. Commented yesterday
1

First, any suggestion that the first horse and/or rider is the antichrist is to completely miss the consistent symbolism of the NT. Specifically:

  • "white" is only ever applied in the NT to Jesus and His throne (Matt 17:2, Mark 9:3, Luke 9:29, Rev 1:14, 19:11, 20:11), holy angels (Matt 28:3, Mark 16:5, John 20:12, Act 1:10), the victorious conquering saints (Rev 3:4, 5, 18, 4:4, 6:11, 7:913, ), as distinct from black or ripe (John 4:35, Matt 5:36, Rev 2:17, 14:14, 19:14). That is, white is NEVER applied to anything evil.
  • "the crown" is a "stephanos" - a crown of laurel leaves denoting victory (used in the Olympic games, 1 Cor 9:25) and always applied to the righteous saints and Jesus, Matt 27:29, Mark 15:17, John 19:2, 5, Phil m4:1, 1 Thess 2:19, 2 Tim 4:8, James 1:12, 1 Peter 5:4, Rev 2:10, 3:11, 4:4, 12:1, 14:14. The exception here is Rev 9:7 where the crowns were only similar to crowns of gold on the demonic locusts, ie, counterfeit crowns.
  • the verb νικάω (nikao) = "overcome", "conquer", is only ever applied to Jesus and the righteous, John 16:33, Rom 3:4, 12:21, 1 John 2:13, 14, 5:4, 5, Rev 2:7, 11, 17, 26, 3:5, 12, 21, 5:5, 12:11. The only exceptions are Rev 11:7, 13:7 where the victory is temporary.

This latter is confirmed by the statement referenced by the OP in 2 Thess 2:6, 7 where the antichrist power is restrained and does NOT overcome.

Thus, whatever the first horse and its rider is, it cannot be the antichrist.

2
  • 1
    Could White also be a time of peace, just as Red is the removal of the previous peace, Black is the time of famine and Pale is the time of Death? The rider would then be the bringer of peace, which would fit the Antichrist, who conquers the world initially by covenants and agreements. Notice that in the fifth seal, the saints have already been martyred by the Antichrist and are now crying to the Lord for justice. The crown of victory is admittedly much more problematic, but perhaps this signifies his temporary rule? Commented yesterday
  • 2
    @Zesty - you have missed the point of my answer. Hermeneutics is based on what the Bible says, and NOT on what sounds nice and "appears to fit". If you wish to proffer such an interpretation, it MUST be based on precedent. While never represents peace; black does not represent famine, etc. symbols MUST be based on the explanations of the scripture itself, not the exegete's imagination. Commented yesterday

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.