0
$\begingroup$

Consider the following: $$\mathrm{d}U=\frac{\partial U(x,y)}{\partial x}\mathrm{d}x+\frac{\partial U(x,y)}{\partial y}\mathrm{d}y.$$ My question: How is this expression supposed to be understood? The expression above is obviously a measure of the sensitivity to change of the function $U$ but with respect to what?

If needed, more context can be provided.

Some context: This is an expression I encountered when reading about indifference curves. See this wiki link.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $dU= U(x+dx,y+dy)-U(x,y)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ @hamam_Abdallah Care to elaborate? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ That looks line two-variable differential. Can you add more context? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ @DonAntonio I've added a little bit of context. If you would like some more, then just tell me :) $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 22:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ok great (they're actually saying almost identical things, perhaps just phrased differently, tht's it) $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 23:46

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Based on the link you supplied, it seems you're comfortable with the idea that if we have a function $f: \Bbb{R}^n \to \Bbb{R}$ and a point $a \in \Bbb{R}^n$ then the derivative of $f$ at $a$ should itself be a linear mapping $M: \Bbb{R}^n \to \Bbb{R}$ such that \begin{align} f(a+h) - f(a) &= M(h) + o(\lVert h \rVert), \end{align} which in words says that the change in the function at the point $a$; i.e $\Delta f_a(h) := f(a+h) - f(a)$ can be approximated by a linear term $M(h)$ plus some "higher order term" which is small in the sense that it can be written as $\Phi_a(h) \cdot \lVert h\rVert$, where $\lim_{h \to 0} \Phi_a(h) = 0$.

One can prove that if $M$ exists then it is unique, which is why one usually writes the linear map $M$ using the notation $Df(a)$ or $Df_a$, or $f'(a)$, or $df(a)$, or $df_a$... basically anything which reminds you of a derivative. For now let's just use the notation $df_a$. Note that in this definition, $df_a$ is not some "infinitesimally small change in $f$". By definition it is a linear mapping $df_a: \Bbb{R}^n \to \Bbb{R}$, such that the following equation holds: \begin{align} \Delta f_a(h) = f(a+h) - f(a) = df_a(h) + o(\lVert h\rVert). \end{align} In other words, $df_a(h)$ is the first-order approximation (i.e the linear approximation) to the actual change $\Delta f_a(h)$ in the function.

Now, how do we calculate the quantity $df_a(h)$? Well, $h = (h^1, \dots, h^n) \in \Bbb{R}^n$ is a vector so we can expand it using the "standard" basis $e_i = (0, \dots \underbrace{1}_{\text{$i^{th}$ spot}}, \dots 0)$, as \begin{align} h &= \sum_{i=1}^n h^i e_i \end{align} Now, since $df_a$ is a linear map, we can write: \begin{align} df_a(h) &= df_a\left(\sum_{i=1}^n h^i e_i\right) = \sum_{i=1}^n df_a(e_i) \cdot h^i \tag{$*$} \end{align} It is pretty easy to prove from the definitions that $df_a(e_i)$ is exactly the $i^{th}$ partial derivative at $a$: \begin{align} df_a(e_i) &= (\partial_if)_a \equiv \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(a) \in \Bbb{R}. \end{align} So, equation $(*)$ can be written as \begin{align} df_a(h) &= \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(a) \cdot h^i \tag{$**$} \end{align} Now, how do we write this as an equation without writing $h$ everywhere? Well, consider the projection function $\pi^i: \Bbb{R}^n \to \Bbb{R}$ defined as $\pi^i(h) = h^i$. This is a linear function so the derivative is easy to compute: it is $(d\pi^i)_a(\cdot) = \pi^i(\cdot)$. So, for every $h \in \Bbb{R}^n$, we have \begin{align} (d \pi^i)_a(h) = \pi^i(h) = h^i. \end{align} So, if we plug this into $(**)$, we get \begin{align} df_a(h) &= \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(a) \cdot (d\pi^i)_a(h) \end{align} So, we can now remove the $h$ everywhere to get \begin{align} df_a &= \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(a) \cdot (d \pi^i)_a \end{align} This is an equality of linear transformations $\Bbb{R}^n \to \Bbb{R}$. Or, if we go one step further, we can suppress the point of derivative evaluation to write simply \begin{align} df &= \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i} \cdot d \pi^i. \end{align} Or finally, if we decide to modify our notation and call the function $\pi^i$ as $x^i$ instead, then we get the very nice memorable equation \begin{align} df &= \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i} dx^i \end{align}


Once again, just to reiterate the whole thing: if $f$ is a nice differentiable function, then we can ask "how can I approximate changes $f$?" The answer is if you want to calculate the change $\Delta f_a(h) = f(a+h) - f(h)$, then by definition of differentiability, you know this is well approximated to linear order by the quantity $df_a(h)$. But how do we calculate $df_a(h)$? It's very simple, just write \begin{align} df = \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}dx^i \end{align} and plug in $a$ and $h$ at the appropriate places to get \begin{align} df_a(h) &= \sum_{i=1}^n\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(a) \cdot (dx^i)_a(h) \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(a) \cdot h^i \end{align} (here, $a$ is the point where we calculate the derivative, and $h$ is to be thought of as the "displacement vector" from $a$ to $a+h$).


Now, you asked

How is this expression supposed to be understood? The expression above is obviously a measure of the sensitivity to change of the function $U$ but with respect to what?

Just to answer this question directly, you should think of it as a linear approximation to the actual change in the value of a function when you vary its argument slightly from $a$ to $a+h$. In your case for $U$, it is slightly easier because there's only two variables. So, at a point $a = (a_1, a_2)$, and for $h = (h_1, h_2)$, we can write \begin{align} dU_{a}(h_1,h_2) &=\dfrac{\partial U}{\partial x}(a)\cdot dx_a(h) +\dfrac{\partial U}{\partial y}(a)\cdot dy_a(h) \\ &= \dfrac{\partial U}{\partial x}(a)\cdot h_1 + \dfrac{\partial U}{\partial y}(a)\cdot h_2. \end{align} So, once again, this is simply the linear approximation to the actual change in the function $\Delta U_a(h) = U(a+h) - U(a) = U(a_1+h_1, a_2+h_2) - U(a_1,a_2)$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.