1

I went to review some posts and saw this:

You have made too many incorrect reviews. For an example of a task you should have reviewed differently, see: https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/8054590 Come back in 14 hours to continue reviewing.

I went to that link and all the reviewers did the same thing as me. Are we all wrong? What is wrong?

2
  • 4
    That particular suggestion should have been rejected - it adds no value whatsoever to the question and fails to correct a couple of grammatical mistakes. The other two reviewers should also have been given a rest for a day. Commented May 15, 2015 at 4:11
  • 2
    That user edited which will not make any sense. Or says not make anything in post so it become easy readable. Also check meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/294206/… Commented May 15, 2015 at 4:18

1 Answer 1

14

Wierd formating does not MaKe a good edit


You approved a trivial edit that added code formatting around the names of various applications. The backticks ( ` ) are for code not an application. They aren't for highlighting, formatting a word in a sentence, or anything else except code.


As for your ban, I suspect (but can't confirm) that a moderator issued a ban for approving such an edit. This isn't an audit failure.

3
  • huh. ok that makes sense. i thought they were just adding <code> around it to format it better. my bad Commented May 15, 2015 at 4:18
  • Yeah, this was not an audit failure; everyone involved in approving any of a number of similar edits was also review-banned, manually. Commented May 15, 2015 at 4:20
  • See meta.stackoverflow.com/a/294207/3001761 Commented May 15, 2015 at 8:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.