7
$\begingroup$

We want to cover an m×m square with n non-overlapping axis-parallel polyominos such that both the interior and the boundary of the square are divided into n equal areas and n equal lengths, respectively. Obviously, m and n cannot be arbitrary for there to be a solution. For example, when n=4, there’s a solution for any m that’s a multiple of 2, and it’s not hard to construct the solution: just divide the square into four equal squares of side m/2.

Here’s a slightly nontrivial example with n = 3 and m = 6:

n=3, m=6

Indeed, the polyominos divide both the interior and the boundary of the square into three equal parts of area 12 and length 8 respectively. It is easy to check that m = 3 doesn’t have a solution, so m = 6 is the minimum possible value for which there’s a solution.

  1. For n = 5, what’s the smallest value of m for which there’s a solution?
  2. Bonus: What about general n?

Clarification: While a polyomino is connected in the interior, the boundary it shares with the big square need not be connected. In that case, the length of the shared boundary is the sum of lengths of all components.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I have no idea what's going on here. I like the colors though! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 7:30

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

n = 5

m = 5: We need 5 pentominoes with 4 boundary edges. The pentomino containing the center cell must look like this, up to rotation/reflection:

pentomino on a 5x5 grid

But then it's impossible for the pentomino on the right to have exactly 4 boundary edges:

2 pentominoes on a 5x5 grid

m = 10: There are many ways to partition the grid into 5 polyominoes with area 20 and 8 boundary edges:

partition of 10x10 grid into 5 polyominoes

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Nice and symmetric! +1 $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 12:11

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.