618

What does the fn here mean?

jQuery.fn.jquery

5 Answers 5

890

In jQuery, the fn property is just an alias to the prototype property.

The jQuery identifier (or $) is just a constructor function, and all instances created with it, inherit from the constructor's prototype.

A simple constructor function:

function Test() {
  this.a = 'a';
}
Test.prototype.b = 'b';

var test = new Test(); 
test.a; // "a", own property
test.b; // "b", inherited property

A simple structure that resembles the architecture of jQuery:

(function() {
  var foo = function(arg) { // core constructor
    // ensure to use the `new` operator
    if (!(this instanceof foo))
      return new foo(arg);
    // store an argument for this example
    this.myArg = arg;
    //..
  };

  // create `fn` alias to `prototype` property
  foo.fn = foo.prototype = {
    init: function () {/*...*/}
    //...
  };

  // expose the library
  window.foo = foo;
})();

// Extension:

foo.fn.myPlugin = function () {
  alert(this.myArg);
  return this; // return `this` for chainability
};

foo("bar").myPlugin(); // alerts "bar"
11
  • 4
    Is this guaranteed to be true? Can I assume a call to jQuery.prototype is exactly the same as jQuery.fn? My worry is if jQuery does some magic when you call .fn then they aren't interchangeable
    – Brandon
    Commented Feb 24, 2012 at 14:08
  • 4
    Oh, I am missing something.. 'window.foo = foo' gives 'foo' a global scope? never new that, I'll add that to my list of techniques to learn.
    – E.E.33
    Commented Mar 5, 2012 at 19:45
  • 2
    @E.E.33 If I'm not mistaken, the global scope in javascript simply means that your variable is a parameter of the window object.
    – Shawn
    Commented Sep 20, 2012 at 17:53
  • 1
    @Imray - return this to allow chaining, so you could do foo("bar").myPlugin().otherPlugin() Commented Feb 12, 2015 at 1:44
  • 3
    @Shawn I think it would be called a property, not a parameter, right? A parameter would be the 'a' variable here function func1 (a) { ... }, and a property would be the 'a' variable here var foo = {}; foo.a = 'a'.
    – Zack
    Commented Feb 27, 2015 at 16:00
167

fn literally refers to the jquery prototype.

This line of code is in the source code:

jQuery.fn = jQuery.prototype = {
 //list of functions available to the jQuery api
}

But the real tool behind fn is its availability to hook your own functionality into jQuery. Remember that jquery will be the parent scope to your function, so this will refer to the jquery object.

$.fn.myExtension = function(){
 var currentjQueryObject = this;
 //work with currentObject
 return this;//you can include this if you would like to support chaining
};

So here is a simple example of that. Lets say I want to make two extensions, one which puts a blue border, and which colors the text blue, and I want them chained.

jsFiddle Demo

$.fn.blueBorder = function(){
 this.each(function(){
  $(this).css("border","solid blue 2px");
 });
 return this;
};
$.fn.blueText = function(){
 this.each(function(){
  $(this).css("color","blue");
 });
 return this;
};

Now you can use those against a class like this:

$('.blue').blueBorder().blueText();

(I know this is best done with css such as applying different class names, but please keep in mind this is just a demo to show the concept)

This answer has a good example of a full fledged extension.

6
  • 11
    Can't you just skip the each in your example code? $.fn.blueBorder = function(){ this.css("border","solid blue 2px"); return this; }; would work fine, as .css() alerady iterates over the elements. Commented May 9, 2013 at 12:31
  • 6
    @SoonDead - You certainly could because if the jQuery object holds a collection then the css function will automatically iterate over them internally with each. It was just an example of showing the differences in this where the outer one is the jquery object and the inner one references the element itself.
    – Travis J
    Commented May 9, 2013 at 18:43
  • 1
    @SoonDead Good comment, but I really like how Travis J explained the idea/principle. :)
    – Sander
    Commented May 30, 2014 at 7:53
  • 5
    This is the best comment -- Knowing that fn is just an alias is not nearly as useful as knowing why anyone should care, and this answer demonstrated it beautifully. Commented Aug 6, 2015 at 19:49
  • 1
    After going through the other answers, I found this one to be easier to understand the main concept. Thank you. :)
    – VivekP
    Commented Oct 10, 2019 at 6:08
152

jQuery.fn is defined shorthand for jQuery.prototype. From the source code:

jQuery.fn = jQuery.prototype = {
    // ...
}

That means jQuery.fn.jquery is an alias for jQuery.prototype.jquery, which returns the current jQuery version. Again from the source code:

// The current version of jQuery being used
jquery: "@VERSION",
4
  • 16
    I like this answer. I shows exactly how to find the definition inside the source code, and then how to interpret the definition in a useful manner. The good ol' "teach a man to fish" method of answering. +1.
    – E.E.33
    Commented Mar 5, 2012 at 19:39
  • but what is the purpose of doing that? just saving couple of keystroke?
    – slier
    Commented Feb 20, 2015 at 10:43
  • @slier: yes, pretty much.
    – Andy E
    Commented Feb 23, 2015 at 9:00
  • i bet there is other purpose..attaching function to $.fn, will make static function
    – slier
    Commented Feb 23, 2015 at 18:29
21

The $.fn is an alias for jQuery.prototype which allows you to extend jQuery with your own functions.

For Example:

 $.fn.something = function{}

will allow you to use

$("#element").something()

The $.fn is also synonymous with jQuery.fn.

2
  • 2
    This is what I was looking for! Thanks a lot :) Commented Mar 18, 2021 at 9:01
  • 1
    Its possible to return a value? how?
    – JTCon
    Commented May 22, 2021 at 17:21
3

In the jQuery source code we have jQuery.fn = jQuery.prototype = {...} since jQuery.prototype is an object the value of jQuery.fn will simply be a reference to the same object that jQuery.prototype already references.

To confirm this you can check jQuery.fn === jQuery.prototype if that evaluates true (which it does) then they reference the same object

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.