Skip to main content

Questions tagged [r-squared]

The coefficient of determination, usually symbolized by $R^2$, is the proportion of the total response variance explained by a regression model. Can also be used for various pseudo R-squared proposed, for instance for logistic regression (and other models.)

5 votes
2 answers
341 views

Two mdoels trained on different training datasets (related but not exactly the same) and tested on the exact same datasets, the model that has higher MSE, still has a higher R², is that possible?
user26416177's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
88 views

I am studying a large dataset of animals subjected to 2 treatments. I aim to assess the impact of treatment on mortality rate. For each observation, I have the number of individuals dead or alive ...
Auguste B's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
198 views

I'm performing a multi-species analysis on in which each data point relates to a species (n = 19). My response variable is a proportion and so I'm using a beta distribution with logit link. I've ...
Lars Ursem's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
78 views

Given a linear model of the type: \begin{equation} \tag{Eq. 1} y=ax + c + \epsilon \end{equation} I take a sample of size $N_{s}$ from a finite population of size $N_{f}$ and take the values of the ...
CafféSospeso's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
55 views

In linear regression $$ Y = \beta \cdot X + N(0,\sigma^2) $$ partial $R^2$ quantifies how much additional variance in the response variable $Y$ is explained by a predictor $X_j$, given that the other ...
Markus Loecher's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
102 views

Yes the regressions have the same number of coefficients. The difference is just that one uses log(Y) instead of Y. The only ...
statnewbie's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
72 views

I'm examining the accuracy of empirical estimates of partial R² in linear models, particularly when compared with their theoretical values (under multivariate normality). I expected them to converge ...
Markus Loecher's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
180 views

There is an over 10-years-old answer which cites a weakness of Tjur's coefficient of determination: Another potential complaint is that the Tjur R2 cannot be easily generalized to ordinal or nominal ...
Igor F.'s user avatar
  • 10.3k
0 votes
0 answers
48 views

Consider a multi-linear regression: \begin{equation} \tag{Eq. 1} Y=(a + b)X + (a + 6b)Z + \epsilon \end{equation} you can see that the slopes of variables $X$ and $Z$ are related by the term $a$. I ...
CafféSospeso's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
16 views

in a multiple linear regression, why can the sum of the partial R-squares of the variables in the model be greater than the R2 of the overall model? I would intuitively expect that the sum of all ...
etewfik's user avatar
  • 109
4 votes
1 answer
170 views

Let's fit a linear model (with an intercept) using ordinary least squares, with more observations that parameters (including the intercept). In such a situation, $ R^2=1-\left(\frac{ \overset{n}{\...
Dave's user avatar
  • 72.9k
4 votes
2 answers
197 views

For a model $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$, the coefficient of determination is unambiguously defined by: $$ R^2=1-\frac{\text{Unexplained variance}}{\text{Total variance}}=1-\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n\...
fma's user avatar
  • 143
3 votes
1 answer
209 views

Say I have two sensors with measurements $\{ x_i \}_{i=1}^n $ and $\{y_i\}_{i=1}^n$ that have a high Pearson correlation, perhaps even perfect correlation by reporting the values in different units (...
Dave's user avatar
  • 72.9k
8 votes
4 answers
2k views

I'm working on calibrating air quality sensor data using a multivariate regression model (Lasso), with predictors like raw PM2.5, humidity, and temperature. After fitting the model, I compared: ...
Anand's user avatar
  • 81
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

I have run a threshold model using MCMCglmm (binary response variable) and obtained the proportion of variance explained by the random effects, but how do I do this for my fixed effect?
Elemen00's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
78