Reverse Logistics Practices

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Ed Davidson

    🏅[Husband to 1, Father of 7]📣Top Voice |🔎Brand Awareness |💲Open to collaborations | 🚀Bringing safety to the forefront |🏆I would be honored if you follow

    339,999 followers

    There ya have it folks... These recoveries involve unstable loads, shifting weight, damaged frames, and massive stored energy in winch lines and rigging. One wrong move can turn a recovery into a fatal incident. Key safety reminders: Establish a wide exclusion zone—no exceptions Use a qualified recovery operator with the right equipment Assume the load will shift suddenly Inspect rigging, anchor points, and ground conditions Never rush—recovery work is high-risk work Slow, planned, and controlled recoveries save lives.

  • Dear US Importers, The Supreme Court did not just put money back in your bank account. What they did was remove the legal foundation for a set of duties that many of you have been paying for years. The difference matters. Refunds are not automatic, they are procedural. If you want your cash back, you are going to have to go through the same channels we always use: PSCs for unliquidated entries, protests for anything still inside the statutory window, and test cases at the Court of International Trade for older entries that are already closed. Same rules, higher stakes. Your first priority should be understanding your entry universe. Open entries are the fastest path — remove the IEEPA duty through a post-summary correction and let Customs reliquidate. Liquidated entries within the protest period move into bulk protests, which will likely be held while CBP waits for headquarters guidance. The real recovery effort, and where most of the dollars will sit, is in the closed-entry population. That is a litigation-driven process at the CIT and it will take time. This is not a one-quarter event; it is a multi-year recovery program. Do not underestimate the importance of your data. Refund eligibility will depend on whether you can tie duty payments to specific entries, document what was paid, and ensure there is no overlap with drawback, transfer pricing adjustments, or other duty recovery mechanisms. Customs is not going to relax its documentation standards just because the underlying tariff was struck down. Clean records will determine who gets paid and who gets denied. Interest will accrue, and for large importers that interest component alone can become material. You also need to bring your tax department into the conversation immediately. Duty refunds are not just cash — they are prior-period cost recoveries. That means you may be looking at income recognition in the year the refund is received, potential amended returns depending on how the duties were treated, and book-to-tax adjustments that will need to be modeled. If you capitalized duties into inventory, the unwind hits cost of goods sold. If you expensed them, you may be dealing with income pickup when the refund arrives. State tax, transfer pricing, and financial statement implications all follow. This is a customs event with a tax shadow. So, no filings, no refunds. The path runs through PSCs, protests, and the CIT, and the companies that move quickly and methodically — with customs, legal, and tax aligned — will be the ones that actually recover their money and report it correctly. This is no longer a legal debate; it is an operational and financial workflow. Let's go get your money - all my love, Uncle Pete

  • View profile for Muhammad Shoaib

    I am Electronics Technician have 7 years Gulf experience in BMS, Electronics and Elevator technician

    4,244 followers

    Dismantling a car is a detailed and methodical process that requires careful planning, safety precautions, and environmental responsibility. Whether you’re in automotive recycling, repair, or parts resale, understanding how to efficiently and safely take a vehicle apart is key to maximizing value and sustainability. Key Steps in Dismantling a Car: Preparation: Begin by disconnecting the battery and removing the hood. Drain all hazardous fluids-engine oil, coolant, transmission fluid, brake fluid-to prevent spills and environmental contamination. Using penetrating sprays on bolts makes removal easier. Engine Removal: Detach engine hoses, wires, transmission, and exhaust system. Use an engine hoist to unbolt and lift the engine out. Engines can be broken down for reusable components or rebuilt to save energy and reduce emissions. Component Stripping: Remove the radiator, alternator, carburetor, and battery. Label and bag parts carefully to keep track and facilitate resale or reuse. Undercarriage and Brake System: Raise the car to remove tires, transmission, exhaust, brake pads, rotors, and brake lines. Follow safety procedures when handling brake fluid and oil. Body Dismantling: Remove fenders, bumpers, doors, windows, lights, and roof panels. Most trim is clip-held but some bolts may require tools. Separate metals for recycling-ferrous and non-ferrous metals fetch better prices when sorted. Why It Matters: Proper dismantling recovers valuable parts like engines, transmissions, alternators, and catalytic converters, which contain precious metals that can be recycled responsibly. Recycling fluids and metals reduces environmental impact, conserves resources, and supports a circular automotive economy. Labeling and documenting parts during dismantling improves efficiency and quality control, helping businesses deliver reliable reused or refurbished components. Dismantling a car is more than just taking it apart-it’s about unlocking value, protecting the environment, and supporting sustainable automotive practices. #Automotive #CarDismantling #Sustainability #Recycling #AutoParts #VehicleRecycling #CircularEconomy

  • View profile for Simon Beard
    Simon Beard Simon Beard is an Influencer

    ⚡ Founder-Operator | Built Culture Kings $600M exit | Beard.com demand-led PE | One Life Club (500 founders) | Creator & experience economy

    40,381 followers

    Aging inventory is one of the biggest bottlenecks for retail brands. Here's how we solved this problem and made $10M+ on clearance items... The reality of retail is that every brand struggles with aging inventory. Most companies just slash prices, damaging their brand and sacrificing margins. At Culture Kings, we pioneered the concept of the mystery box instead. Here's how it worked: Every year, we'd make a killing on the slowest month in retail, February. We'd run our Mystery Box promotion: 3 items for $50. Seems simple, but there was serious psychology behind it. The key was to avoid bundling clearance items. Here's what we did instead: We engineered the Mystery Box with a specific formula: 2 items specifically created for the promotion + 1 clearance item we needed to move This is where 99% of retailers got it wrong. Most brands just bundle unsold items and hope for the best. But the fact is, clearance items didn't sell for a reason. Instead, you need to find a way to keep trust, but also maintain your margins. We deliberately created products just for these promotions. Items that: • Had high perceived value • Matched our brand aesthetic • But were inexpensive to produce The math was simple: Clearance item: Cost $5 (Retail $30) Engineered item #1: Cost $5 (Perceived value $30) Engineered item #2: Cost $5 (Perceived value $30) Total cost: $15 Selling price: $50 Customer perceived value: $90+ This approach solved multiple problems: • Cleared aging inventory without brand damage • Generated healthy margins even during clearance • Customers felt they got a great deal • Built anticipation and excitement around our "sale" events The Mystery Box concept became so popular, that customers would line up for them. We turned a traditional loss-leader (clearance) into a profit center AND a marketing tool. The big lesson: Don't just discount when clearing inventory. Engineer a customer experience where they feel they're getting tremendous value, while you achieve your inventory goals. This strategy scaled to millions in revenue during traditionally slow retail months. PS: Founders, I broke down the 5 biggest mistakes that kept my business from scaling to 8, then 9 figures. If you want to learn how to avoid them, sign up here: https://lnkd.in/eCY_2KQx

  • View profile for Ch Siva 🇮🇳

    |PO -Putaway -Picking |Procurement In. Warehouse Out. SAP in Between.|SAP MM & EWM | | GenAI | Prompt Engineering in Chatgpt |SAP Trainer |

    50,471 followers

    🚀 🌍 Movement Types (MM) Transaction/Event Keys (FI) Purpose + End-to-End Process 🔹 1. What are Movement Types in SAP? Movement Type = Inventory transaction type It tells SAP: What stock is moving From where → to where And what accounting impact should happen 🔸 Common Movement Types (Must Know) 🟢 Goods Receipt (GR) 101 → GR for Purchase Order 103 → GR blocked stock 105 → Release blocked stock 👉 Purpose: Increase stock + create accounting entry 🔴 Goods Issue (GI) 201 → Issue to Cost Center 261 → Issue to Production Order 281 → Issue for Network (PM/PS) 👉 Purpose: Consumption → reduce stock 🔵 Transfer Posting 301 → Plant to Plant 311 → Storage Location to Storage Location 321 → Quality → Unrestricted 322 → Unrestricted → Quality 👉 Purpose: Change stock location/type (no vendor/customer) 🟡 Returns / Reversals 122 → Return to Vendor 102 → Reverse GR (101 reversal) 262 → Reverse GI (261 reversal) 👉 Purpose: Cancel wrong postings 🟣 Physical Inventory 701 → Inventory Gain 702 → Inventory Loss 👉 Purpose: Adjust stock differences 🔹 2. What are Transaction/Event Keys? These are used in FI integration (OBYC configuration). 👉 Movement Type → triggers → Transaction Key → G/L Account 🔸 Most Important Transaction Keys Transaction Key Purpose BSX Inventory Posting WRX GR/IR Clearing GBB Offset (Consumption / Expense) PRD Price Difference KON Purchase Account (Conditions) FRE Freight Clearing BSV Posting for Negative Stock UMB Stock Transfer Posting VAX Goods Issue for Sales (COGS) 🔹 3. End-to-End Process (MM → FI Integration) Let’s take a real scenario 👇 🧾 Scenario: Purchase Order → Goods Receipt → Invoice Step 1: Goods Receipt (Movement Type 101) 👉 Stock increases Accounting Entry: Inventory A/c (BSX) → Dr GR/IR A/c (WRX) → Cr Step 2: Invoice Receipt (MIRO) 👉 Liability created Accounting Entry: GR/IR A/c (WRX) → Dr Vendor A/c → Cr Step 3: Payment Vendor A/c → Dr Bank A/c → Cr 🔸 Scenario: Goods Issue to Production (261) Accounting Entry: Consumption A/c (GBB) → Dr Inventory A/c (BSX) → Cr 🔸 Scenario: Price Difference If invoice ≠ PO price: PRD (Price Difference) triggered 🔹 4. How Movement Type Links to Transaction Key Flow: Movement Type → Account Modifier → Transaction Key → G/L Account Example: Movement Type 261 Uses GBB with modifier VBR Posts to Consumption G/L 🔹 5. Interview-Level Points 🔥 ✔ Movement type controls: Stock type (UR/QI/Blocked) Quantity update Value update Account

  • View profile for Javier Gascón Araujo

    Claude Ambassador Madrid ✦ Implementing, teaching and building with AI ✦ Writing Climate Tech Distillery

    14,394 followers

    Tesla’s former CTO is turning dead batteries into new ones through his new company, now valued at $6 billion. 🔋♻️🔋 After 15 years as Tesla's co-founder and CTO, JB Straubel left to tackle what he saw as the next critical challenge: The battery supply chain ↳ Under 5% of US batteries get recycled ↳ 80% of battery production happens in Asia ↳ A huge wave of end-of-life batteries coming ↳ Billions thrown away in critical materials we don't recover from batteries The current approach just isn't sustainable... ↳ Dangerous battery waste piling up in landfills ↳ Virgin mining destroys ecosystems and involves shady labor practices ↳ Can't keep up with huge demand growth for lithium, nickel, cobalt, etc. So he came up with a breakthrough idea. Turning old batteries into new ones at scale. Redwood Materials was born 😎 A circular battery economy: a) Recover 95%+ of lithium, cobalt, nickel from dead batteries b) Refine them into anode copper foil and cathode materials c) Make them 20-30% cheaper than newly mined materials d) Cut battery production emissions by up to 80% The impact? Mind-blowing: ↳ 20 GWh processed annually (250K EVs worth) ↳ 90% of all batteries recycled in North America ↳ 80% less water, 70% less energy than mining They started in 2017 and they haven't stopped growing. Massive facility in Nevada and now a $3.5 billion one in South Carolina. Congrats to the whole team 🎉 . If you could ask them anything, what would it be? – If this company sounds interesting to you 👇 🗞 Grab my 5 min newsletter issue about them: https://lnkd.in/eMfBUFku

  • View profile for Kate Brandt
    Kate Brandt Kate Brandt is an Influencer

    Board Member at Builders Vision

    239,484 followers

    Back when I worked for the US Department of the Navy, it became clear that the historic airship hangars at Moffett Federal Airfield required significant remediation. Fast-forward fifteen years: now those same hangars are under Google’s care, and our sustainability and real estate teams are taking innovative and responsible approaches to honor the airfield. Instead of a typical demolition, which would have routed the historic timber to the landfill, we tried a different approach. We worked closely with many partners to carefully deconstruct the building and salvaged approximately 119,000 board feet of old-growth Douglas-fir lumber for reuse. The lumber salvaged from Hangar 3 is now getting a new life in showcase installations across Google campuses in the Bay Area, California, and for mass timber construction at supporting office facilities on Google data center campuses. The building industry has made measurable progress in reducing embodied and operational carbon, yet the materials within the built environment typically follow a one-way path from extraction to disposal. This project shows that there’s a more sustainable alternative. With a rigorous process and a motivated team, we can challenge the status quo of demolition and instead view our existing buildings as “material banks.” Read more about the process and check out some of the amazing photos from the site in our new blog: goo.gle/3Syfgbq

  • View profile for Richard Lim
    Richard Lim Richard Lim is an Influencer

    Retail Economist | Shaping the Retail Debate Through Proprietary Research & Insight | CEO & Founder, Retail Economics

    38,829 followers

    It was great to launch our latest report with ZigZag Global: "Lessons from 100 returns". We conducted over 100 mystery returns among clothing retailers, collecting over 5,000 data points to build a returns excellence model. Data included: ▶️ Proportion of free returns ▶️ The cost of returns ▶️ Number of return options ▶️ Speed refunds were processed ▶️ Can the retailers' packaging be reused ▶️ And lots, lots more! Here's what we learnt: 1️⃣ Insight 1: A minority of fashion retailers offer totally free returns Just 24 of the 100 retailers offer totally free returns – they charge no returns fee and either offer free delivery or refund delivery charges. Many leading fashion retailers have increasingly turned to deliberate friction as a way to manage spiralling returns costs. Brands such as PrettyLittleThing, H&M, and Boohoo have all introduced returns charges, while others have begun monitoring high-frequency returners and restricting order volumes for the most extreme cases. This "deliberate friction" is likely to increase and become more targeted at those who return the most, to curb undesirable behaviour. 2️⃣ Insight 2: Marketplaces and partners undermine returns control We found instances where 3rd party brands sold via marketplace models often created extremely poor return experiences. Consumers can't (nor should they) distinguish between a 1st party and 3rd party fulfilment. Returning to a 3rd party often felt like the retailer absolved responsibility, leaving the process clunky. Some retailers only accepted returns via phone or customer service emails & refunds were much slower. 3️⃣ Insight 3: National store estates give retailers a cost advantage on returns Many retailers now differentiate between return channels, offering free returns to store while charging between £2 and £3 for postal returns (e.g. Next and H&M). For those with dense store estates, it reduces the cost-per-transaction, encourages footfall into stores, and leverages existing infrastructure by consolidating both online and in-store returns into warehouse shipments. For retailers with a smaller footprint, the lack of easy access risks deterring online purchases – although services such as ClickLink and Asda ToYou are enabling online-only retailers to use others’ store estates for their returns. Some other frustrating moments from 100 different returns: 💥 Huge boxes for tiny items (e.g. socks in a shoebox). 💥 Excessive tape instead of resealable packaging. 💥 One in ten requiring customers to print labels (one retailer required us to print nine pages to return a hat). 💥 Confusing or hidden fees (one retailer, for instance, charged a £5 'restocking fee’ which was not explained, plus a £3 returns fee.) Small operational details make a big difference and as margins tighten, returns excellence is fast becoming a critical component for profitability and trust. There is so much more in the report. Download for free here ⬇️ https://lnkd.in/eF-BDUuC

  • View profile for Akshit Goel

    Google | LinkedIn Top Voice | Forensic Teardowns of Indian Startups and Consumer Brands | MBA, SPJIMR

    27,148 followers

    Indian Shoppers Love Free Returns — Brands Are Paying the Price (₹370 billion) Let’s break it down step-by-step: 1. The Big Picture GMV of Indian E-Commerce: ~$75 billion Average Order Value (AOV): ₹2,000 Estimated total number of orders/year: = $75B × ₹83/USD ÷ ₹2,000 ≈ 3 billion orders annually 2. Market Split by Category Let’s divide these orders by category: Apparel & Footwear: 50% share → 1.5 billion orders Electronics: 30% share → 0.9 billion orders Others (Home, Beauty, etc.): 20% share → 0.6 billion orders 3. Return Rates by Category - Apparel & Footwear: 25% - Electronics: 10% - Others: 20% Using category-level volumes and return rates: • Apparel: 25% of 1.5B = 375M • Electronics: 10% of 0.9B = 90M • Others: 20% of 0.6B = 120M Total Returns/year = ~585M (rounded to 600 million) - Overall return rate ≈ 20% 4. Cost Breakdown: 4 Major Return Costs a. Reverse Logistics • Assumption: ₹200/order • Cost = 600M × ₹200 = ₹120 billion This includes pickup, handling, transfer — and is usually free for the customer. b. Damaged Goods • Assumption: 20% of returns are unsellable • 20% × 600M = 120M items lost If the average inventory cost is 40% of AOV = ₹800 Cost = 120M × ₹800 = ₹96 billion → Rounded to ₹100B c. Faulty Goods & Reselling • 50% of returns need repair or markdown • 50% × 600M = 300M items Refurbishing/resale cost = 25% of AOV = ₹500 Cost = 300M × ₹500 = ₹150 billion 5. Total Estimated Cost - Reverse Logistics: ₹120B - Damaged Goods: ₹100B - Resale/Repair: ₹150B Total = ₹370 billion (~$4.5 billion) That’s 6% of the GMV being wiped out annually. But as a percentage of revenue (not GMV)? It’s much higher. Most platforms operate on thin take-rates (10–15%). So for every ₹100 earned, returns alone can eat up ₹30–60 40–45% of returns in fashion are driven by size and fit issues Most customers “bracket” — ordering multiple sizes with the intent to return Every return adds cost: pickup, re-inspection, repackaging, resale (if possible) If unsellable, the product is written off, instantly impacting margins Free returns = more orders, lower friction But they also mean: - Higher logistics volume - Lower inventory turnover - Shrinking profitability Platforms are responding: [1] Return fees for chronic returners [2] Shorter return windows (7–10 days) [3] Store credit incentives instead of full refunds [4] Free returns as loyalty perks, not a blanket policy Returns Aren’t the End — They’re a Second Market The refurbished goods market is booming: - Flipkart’s 2GUD, Amazon Renewed - $20B+ market projected in India over the next 6 years - Electronics, home appliances, and even fashion are seeing resale traction Returns are being converted into opportunity through resale, refurbishment, and recommerce.

  • View profile for Onkar Ojha
    Onkar Ojha Onkar Ojha is an Influencer

    Software Engineer @ Amazon | Distributed Systems | Backend Engineering | Java | Golang | Microservices | AWS

    15,041 followers

    🧩 Distributed Transactions in Microservices – The Hidden Nightmare Let’s say you're building an e-commerce platform. You’ve broken down your monolith into decoupled microservices: 🛒 Order Service (PostgreSQL) 📦 Inventory Service (MongoDB) 💰 Payment Service (MySQL) 🚚 Shipping Service (Cassandra) Each service manages its own database. Life is good... until it’s not. 😱 The Problem A user places an order. Here's what needs to happen: Order is created ✅ Inventory is reserved ✅ Payment is deducted ✅ Shipping is scheduled ❌ Suddenly, the Shipping Service fails maybe due to a timeout, a network error, or an unavailable carrier. Now what? You’ve already deducted payment and reserved inventory. There’s no easy way to rollback across multiple databases and services. Distributed transactions are not natively supported across microservices. Using 2-phase commits? Forget it's slow, complex, and breaks under scale. 🔄 Enter the SAGA Pattern SAGA solves this by breaking the transaction into a sequence of local transactions – each with a compensating action in case something fails. Let’s walk through the same scenario with SAGA: 🛒 Order Service creates the order → emits OrderCreated event 📦 Inventory Service reserves items → emits InventoryReserved or rolls back via ReleaseInventory 💰 Payment Service deducts amount → emits PaymentSuccessful or compensates via RefundPayment 🚚 Shipping Service fails to schedule → emits ShippingFailed → triggers compensating actions: •RefundPayment •ReleaseInventory •CancelOrder Each service maintains local state and knows how to undo its step if needed. 💡 Two Approaches: Choreography – Services listen to and act on domain events. Orchestration – A central orchestrator coordinates the flow. 🧱 SAGA DB Design Behind the Scenes In an orchestration-based saga: saga_instance → tracks the entire flow saga_step_log → logs each step’s status (SUCCESS / FAILED / COMPENSATED) Each microservice stores its part of the transaction locally (idempotency + recovery) ✅ Key Benefits No need for distributed transactions Works with independent databases Allows graceful rollback with compensation Keeps systems event-driven and loosely coupled

Explore categories