Re: Re: [RFC] Slim POST data (was: PHP-5.6 and $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA)

From: Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:57:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Slim POST data (was: PHP-5.6 and $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA)
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-70390@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message 
Hi all,

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Ryan McCue <lists@rotorised.com> wrote:

> Michael Wallner wrote:
> > On 23 November 2013 22:40, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> what do you think?
> >
> > Sounds doable! I'd implement the INI with 1, "On", 0, "Off", and
> > -1,
> > "Never" settings, if nobody objects (the first two for BC and "Never"
> > to complement).
> >
>
> I'd probably go with 2 rather than -1, just in case we want to turn it
> into a bitmask in the future (unsigned seems better than signed to me
> anyway).


Any positive number is max size of input, right?
Is this correct?

Then, 0 for unlimited and -1 for disabled sounds reasonable to me.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

Thread (32 messages)

« previous php.internals (#70390) next »