On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:00 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I think it would be nice to either reconstruct or split the RFC.
> Currently it is a bit hard to tell, that what is changed in which
> version.
I changed to RFC to be easier comprehensible (hopefully).
> I think it would make sense, to have an RFC for 5.6 about introducing
> the new stream, the new ini option and and how does it keeps userland
> BC while providing a way to opt-in for the performance gain, and that
> it introduces an E_DEPRECATED so we can remove the ini and the raw
> post global variable in the next major version.
I think we cannot add E_DEPRECATED to the INI-setting unless we make its
default -1... which breaks BC :p
Also, I think two RFCs would be quite much, but I already gave up my
renitency.
--
Regards,
Mike