2013.11.26. 1:03, "Ryan McCue" <lists@rotorised.com> ezt írta:
>
> Michael Wallner wrote:
> > On 23 November 2013 22:40, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> what do you think?
> >
> > Sounds doable! I'd implement the INI with 1, "On", 0, "Off", and
> > -1,
> > "Never" settings, if nobody objects (the first two for BC and "Never"
> > to complement).
> >
>
> I'd probably go with 2 rather than -1, just in case we want to turn it
> into a bitmask in the future (unsigned seems better than signed to me
> anyway).
>
> --
> Ryan McCue
>
I don't think there is any chance that we would want to turn it into a
bitmask, as the values are mutually exclusive.
And the ini should go away with the next major anyways.