2

I was advised, on a cycling forum, that the chain length as shown in these photos was just fine and I should leave it be. I was of the opinion that I ought to remove at least one link because the derailleur body was sitting much higher with the new chain that it was with the old chain and I would value a second opinion. BTW, the large/large setting is fine with a long-armed derailleur pointing at roughly the 5 o'clock position.

Here is a photo of the chain in the small/small configuration:

enter image description here

Here is a close up of the derailleur.

enter image description here

Here is the derailleur as it was on the old chain and how I think it ought to be on the new chain...which I think would be remedied by the removal of one link

enter image description here

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3

It's technically OK the way it is now, but if the derailleur pulley arm is at the 5 o'clock position in big/big like you say, then it sounds like you could take out a link or two.

However, be aware that the ability to shift to big/big is the overarching goal. The only problem you have right now is that the slackness in small/small could result in a little bit of chain bouncing around when riding in rough terrain. If you were to take out too many links resulting in the inability to shift to big/big, then the downside becomes catastrophic damage if you attempt to shift to big/big while under any kind of load. You'd be breaking something such as your derailleur, chainring, or cassette.

So if you do go ahead and take out any links, confirm the ability to shift to big/big before riding. This test includes a shift from 2nd largest cog to largest cog while in the big ring, and also a shift from small ring to big ring while in the largest cog.

Or another thing to confirm is simply compare the length of the old chain to the new chain while off the bike. If the old chain was fine, that that will tell you for sure what to do if the lengths don't match (ignoring chain stretch in the old chain, it's the number of links that matters).

Improve this answer
2
  • You can also use a calculator and see what it suggests. E.g: bergfreunde.eu/chain-length-calculator (note that your pulleys probably are 11T for result adjustment). Commented 9 hours ago
  • Thanks so much for that detailed response. That chain link calculator will not accommodate my 470mm chain stay length; it maxed out at 460mm. Using another online calculator, it returned 114 links as the size my chain should be. Counting the outer links on each chain and doubling it, I get 50/116 on the old chain and 60/120 on the new one. rollmassif.com/chain-link-calculator Commented 6 hours ago

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.