0
$\begingroup$

This link shows the derivation of this formula for a concave quadrilateral.

This link shows the derivation of this formula for a convex quadrilateral. The formula I'm talking about is: $$ \frac{1}{2}\left[ab \sin \theta + cd \sqrt{1- \left(\frac {c^2+d^2-a^2-b^2+2ab\cos\theta}{2cd}\right)^2} \right] $$ This post will be dedicated to the proving of this formula for any self intersecting quadrilateral. figure

Here, $ABCD$ is our self intersecting quadrilateral whose area will be denoted by $ \Delta $. We will be taking $AB=a, BC=b, CD=c, AD=d$ and $\angle B$ as $\theta$. We are assuming that $a,b,c,d,\theta$ are given. Also, we have to be careful while assigning these variables since the angle $\theta$ must lie between the sides $a,b$. $$ \Delta = Ar\triangle ADC+Ar\triangle ABC \\ \Delta =\frac{1}{2}cd\sin \angle D+\frac{1}{2}ab\sin \theta $$ Note that the intersecting area of $\triangle AEC$ is accounted for by $\sin \theta$ as it can be negative when $\theta$ is reflex. Now, by using the law of cosines, $$ AC^2=a^2+b^2-2ab\cos \theta \\ AC^2=c^2+d^2-2cd\cos \angle D $$ Subtracting these equations from each other yields: $$ a^2+b^2-2ab\cos \theta-c^2-d^2+2cd\cos \angle D=0 \\ \cos \angle D=\frac{c^2+d^2-a^2-b^2+2ab\cos \theta}{2cd} $$ Now, using the identity $ \sin\angle D= \sqrt{1-\cos^2\angle D} $, we get: $$ \sin\angle D= \sqrt{1- \left(\frac {c^2+d^2-a^2-b^2+2ab\cos\theta}{2cd}\right)^2} $$ And putting this into $ \frac{1}{2}ab\sin\theta+\frac{1}{2}cd\sin\angle D $, we get: $$ \frac{1}{2}\left[ab \sin \theta + cd \sqrt{1- \left(\frac {c^2+d^2-a^2-b^2+2ab\cos\theta}{2cd}\right)^2} \right] $$ So, my formula is correct for any self intersecting quadrilateral. And, as seen in the linked posts, it is also correct for any concave and convex quadrilateral. This makes it a formula for a general quadrilateral which requires only four sides and one angle. Please let me know if I'm wrong.

The more important thing here is that the formula may be very tedious and more time consuming to use than the original method itself, but the fact that it exists shows that the area of a quadrilateral will always be fixed given the same four sides and one angle (as long as the given angle lies between two sides of the same length). I did not previously think that this could be the case.

Furthermore, this formula is more minimalistic than Bretschneider's formula because it requires one angle instead of two.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ "This post 2ill be dedicated to proving..." That is not what posts are fore. Posts here are specific math questions, not publication of results. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10 at 16:58
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Parth, this information isn't new: a single angle fixed between two sides makes the quad rigid, the area is then fixed for two other given sides, as I said in your first post. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10 at 16:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ThomasAndrews I understand your concern, but my post's main purpose is asking whether or not this is a known result and checking if I went wrong anywhere. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10 at 17:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Then you could just ask the question without the extensive proof. It needs an outline at best. All that is really required is the formula. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DhairyaKumar My point here is about having a minimalistic formula. As I haven't seen any other formula which uses 4 sides and one angle. As for simplicity, I'm trying to do that $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 13 at 10:48

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.