Here in New Zealand, about a week into the war in Iran, petrol prices shot up by about a third overnight, and have stayed there since. I was talking to a friend in America who described a more gradual and less extreme price rise (all things being relative, I don't mean to downplay a rise of less than a third, that's more gradual than overnight).
I have heard that while a third to a fifth (I've heard both figures) of the world's oil passes through the strait of Hormuz, the oil that passes through there is bound for the Asia/Pacific region, so any fuel shortages that result from the closure of the strait will affect the Asia-Pacific region more acutely. Places like America will experience price rises because of the general principle that prices rise when a commodity becomes more scarce, while the Asia/Pacific region will actually see their supply cut off.
To start with, is this accurate? I can think of other reasons America might be weathering this fuel crisis better than us; domestic supply, strategic reserves, etc.
But I am also hearing of places like Malaysia and Philippines (conspicuously not China) experiencing extreme fuel shortages. It's logical that there'd be a disparity in what places are most affected by the closure of the strait, but is it accurate that some places will simply experience a price shock during to the rules of supply & demand, while other places will experience actual shortages?