I've been alive through many presidencies, and I see no reason why presidencies should last 4 years.
Has there ever been a country where presidencies lasted 2 years?
I've been alive through many presidencies, and I see no reason why presidencies should last 4 years.
Has there ever been a country where presidencies lasted 2 years?
As a matter of history, El Salvador had 2-year presidential terms for a period during the 19th century. That is the only case I know of; most nations grant terms of at least 4 years. When the US Founding Fathers were debating the length of term for the Presidency, there was a wide range of opinions: some delegates advocated for lifetime tenure while others wanted one or three year terms of office. the issue was largely over how powerful the president should be; more years in office translates to a more centralized, president-dominated governance. The four year re-electable term was adopted as a compromise.
Not currently, but the Presidencies of Fiji and Nauru currently have three year terms. (up to a maximum of two terms)
The President of Switzerland is chosen for a one year term, but that's a rather different role. It isn't directly elected, but chosen by the members of the Federal Council. The President is not head of State (the Council is Head of State)
Frameshift on
I see no reason why presidencies should last 4 years.
Well, one reason for having a government (President, Prime Minister, etc...) run for more than 2 years is that it would otherwise be in a constant state of election campaigning and would have no incentive to pursue any long term reforms, projects or adjustments that took more than 2 years.
Considering that a government needs to staff a cabinet, draw up plans for a project and then start implementing them, few projects would actually show returns, good or bad, before the next elections arrived.
That's not to say that very long terms are a good idea. Until 2000 France had 7 year presidential cycles and that was a very long time to have a dud president stick around. I had the misfortune to experience that with such 2 presidents, from opposite sides of the political aisles, and the absence of fresh thinking from those septuagenarians was quite unpleasant. Now it's back to a saner 5 years.
BTW, this gets even worse when the budgetary and legislative system allows for the delivery of "goodies" by the incumbent government right before elections. Because it essentially doubles their incentives to engage in voter manipulation that way.
In switzerland the president is only elected for one year. However, the president has not much extra power over the other 6 members of the government (s/he gets to preside the meetings of the ministers). The 7 ministers ("federal councilors") have terms of 4 years but can be re-elected for an infinite number of times.