Mapped: Life Expectancy by U.S. State
Published
Design
See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.
Save to Inbox
Mapped: Life Expectancy by U.S. State
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key Takeaways
- Hawaii had the highest life expectancy in the U.S. at 80.0 years, while West Virginia ranked lowest at 72.2 years.
- The national average was 77.5 years, but more than half of states (28) fell below that mark.
- The gap between the highest- and lowest-ranked states was 7.8 years.
Life expectancy varies widely across the U.S., with clear regional patterns emerging in the latest data.
States in the Northeast and on the West Coast tend to have higher life expectancies, while many in the South and Appalachia rank lower.
This map shows these differences using data from the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, based on 2022 life tables published in December 2025, the latest publicly available state-level figures as of March 2026.
The CDC’s report uses period life tables, which estimate how long a hypothetical group would live if it experienced the death rates observed in 2022 at every age. In other words, the measure captures current mortality conditions in each state, not a forecast for babies born there today.
Where Americans Live the Longest, and the Shortest
Among the 50 states and D.C., Hawaii had the highest life expectancy at birth in 2022 at 80.0 years. Massachusetts followed at 79.8, with New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut close behind.
The data table below shows the life expectancy of every U.S. state and D.C.:
| Rank | State | Life Expectancy (Years) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawaii | 80.0 |
| 2 | Massachusetts | 79.8 |
| 3 | New Jersey | 79.6 |
| 4 | New York | 79.5 |
| 5 | Connecticut | 79.4 |
| 6 | California | 79.3 |
| 7 | Minnesota | 79.3 |
| 8 | Rhode Island | 79.2 |
| 9 | Utah | 79.0 |
| 10 | New Hampshire | 78.7 |
| 11 | Colorado | 78.5 |
| 12 | Idaho | 78.4 |
| 13 | Washington | 78.4 |
| 14 | Nebraska | 78.3 |
| 15 | Vermont | 78.3 |
| 16 | Wisconsin | 78.1 |
| 17 | North Dakota | 77.9 |
| 18 | Iowa | 77.9 |
| 19 | Florida | 77.9 |
| 20 | Maryland | 77.8 |
| 21 | Oregon | 77.7 |
| 22 | Illinois | 77.5 |
| 23 | Virginia | 77.5 |
| 24 | Pennsylvania | 77.3 |
| 25 | South Dakota | 77.3 |
| 26 | Montana | 77.3 |
| 27 | Texas | 77.1 |
| 28 | Wyoming | 76.8 |
| 29 | Michigan | 76.8 |
| 30 | Arizona | 76.7 |
| 31 | Maine | 76.6 |
| 32 | District of Columbia | 76.6 |
| 33 | Delaware | 76.5 |
| 34 | Kansas | 76.5 |
| 35 | Nevada | 76.4 |
| 36 | Georgia | 75.9 |
| 37 | North Carolina | 75.9 |
| 38 | Alaska | 75.8 |
| 39 | Ohio | 75.6 |
| 40 | Indiana | 75.4 |
| 41 | Missouri | 75.2 |
| 42 | South Carolina | 75.1 |
| 43 | New Mexico | 74.5 |
| 44 | Arkansas | 73.9 |
| 45 | Oklahoma | 73.8 |
| 46 | Tennessee | 73.8 |
| 47 | Alabama | 73.8 |
| 48 | Louisiana | 73.8 |
| 49 | Kentucky | 73.6 |
| 50 | Mississippi | 72.6 |
| 51 | West Virginia | 72.2 |
On the other end of the ranking, West Virginia came in last at 72.2 years, behind Mississippi at 72.6 and Kentucky at 73.6.
The broad pattern is regional: the Northeast and West Coast have higher life expectancies, while many Southern and Appalachian states cluster at the bottom.
Why the National Average Misses the State Divide
While the national average is 77.5 years, only 21 states cleared that mark. Illinois and Virginia matched it exactly, and the remaining 28 states came in below it.
The CDC also found that females had higher life expectancy than males in every state and D.C., but the size of that gender gap varied widely. States on the lower end of life expectancy tended to have larger divides, while higher-ranked states had smaller gaps.
For example, New Mexico (ninth-lowest life expectancy at 74.5) recorded the largest female-male gap at 6.9 years, while Utah (ninth-highest at 79 years) had the smallest at 3.6 years.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Why Living Longer Isn’t Always Living Healthier on Voronoi.
You may also like
Mapped: The Most Expensive States for Healthcare in 2026
See healthcare costs by state in 2026, from Massachusetts and Alaska at the top to Mississippi and Alabama at the bottom.
Published
September 8, 2026 7:09 am
Mapped: The Most Expensive States for Healthcare in 2026
Key Takeaways
- Massachusetts has the highest healthcare costs in the ranking, at nearly 32% above the U.S. average.
- Eight of the 10 highest-cost states are in the Northeast or West.
- Mississippi has the lowest healthcare index at 85.1, around 15% below the national average.
Healthcare prices vary substantially across the U.S., with the gap between the highest- and lowest-cost states approaching 47 index points.
This map ranks all 50 states and the District of Columbia by their healthcare cost index in 2026, with the national average set at 100.
The data for this visualization comes from the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC), using data from the Council for Community and Economic Research’s Cost of Living Index.
The healthcare component is based on listed prices for doctor, dentist, and optometrist visits, along with commonly used drugs.
Massachusetts and Alaska Lead the Ranking
Massachusetts has the highest healthcare index at 131.8, meaning costs are nearly 32% above the national benchmark.
| Rank | State | Healthcare Cost Index (U.S. = 100) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts | 131.8 |
| 2 | Alaska | 130.7 |
| 3 | District of Columbia | 118.7 |
| 4 | New Jersey | 115.8 |
| 5 | Oregon | 115.3 |
| 6 | Maine | 114.7 |
| 7 | Hawaii | 113.1 |
| 8 | Minnesota | 111.5 |
| 9 | California | 111.1 |
| 10 | Washington | 110.3 |
| 11 | Connecticut | 108.9 |
| 11 | New York | 108.9 |
| 13 | North Carolina | 108.4 |
| 14 | Vermont | 108.2 |
| 15 | North Dakota | 107.7 |
| 16 | Maryland | 106.9 |
| 17 | New Hampshire | 106.5 |
| 18 | Montana | 106.3 |
| 19 | Nebraska | 105.6 |
| 20 | Nevada | 105.4 |
| 21 | Wisconsin | 105.3 |
| 22 | Rhode Island | 104.1 |
| 22 | South Dakota | 104.1 |
| 24 | Colorado | 103.9 |
| 25 | Illinois | 103 |
| 26 | New Mexico | 101.9 |
| 27 | Delaware | 101.6 |
| 27 | Idaho | 101.6 |
| 29 | Florida | 101.4 |
| 30 | Georgia | 99.6 |
| 31 | Arizona | 98.8 |
| 32 | Oklahoma | 98.1 |
| 33 | Missouri | 98 |
| 34 | South Carolina | 97.6 |
| 35 | Wyoming | 97 |
| 36 | Virginia | 96.9 |
| 37 | Texas | 96.8 |
| 38 | Ohio | 96.5 |
| 39 | Pennsylvania | 95.1 |
| 40 | Iowa | 94.3 |
| 41 | Kentucky | 92.4 |
| 42 | Louisiana | 91.6 |
| 43 | Indiana | 91.5 |
| 44 | Kansas | 90.6 |
| 45 | Utah | 89.9 |
| 46 | West Virginia | 89.5 |
| 47 | Tennessee | 88.7 |
| 48 | Michigan | 88.2 |
| 49 | Arkansas | 85.8 |
| 50 | Alabama | 85.6 |
| 51 | Mississippi | 85.1 |
Massachusetts is home to a dense network of major hospitals, universities, and research institutions. High wages and operating costs can also contribute to higher healthcare prices.
Alaska follows closely at 130.7. Its geography creates a very different cost structure, with remote communities often facing limited provider competition and higher transportation and staffing expenses.
Delivering medical services across large distances can make routine care more expensive.
High Costs Cluster in the Northeast and West
The top of the ranking has a clear regional tilt, with eight of the 10 highest-cost states located in the Northeast or West.
New Jersey has an index of 115.8 and Maine stands at 114.7, while Connecticut and New York both come in at 108.9. High labor, real estate, and operating costs can contribute to higher prices across the region.
Western states also feature prominently. Oregon ranks fifth nationally at 115.3, followed by Hawaii at 113.1, California at 111.1, and Washington at 110.3.
The South Has Some of the Lowest Healthcare Costs
At the opposite end of the ranking, Mississippi has the lowest healthcare index at 85.1.
Alabama follows at 85.6, while Arkansas stands at 85.8. Tennessee, at 88.7, and West Virginia, at 89.5, also rank among the least expensive.
Overall, the gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi is 46.7 index points, underscoring the wide variation in routine healthcare prices across the country.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapped: U.S. States With the Most Financial Distress on Voronoi.
Mapped: Health Care Spending Per Person by State
Explore health care spending by state in 2024, from Alaska’s $14K per resident to Utah’s $7.2K, and the factors driving regional differences.
Published
July 14, 2026 7:11 am
Mapped: Health Care Spending Per Person by State
Key Takeaways:
- Americans spent an average of $9,717 per person on health care in 2024, ranging from $7,233 in Utah to $14,044 in Alaska.
- Alaska, Washington, D.C., South Dakota, New York, and West Virginia recorded the highest per-capita spending.
- Much of the variation reflects differences in health care prices, provider availability, demographics, and geography, not simply how often people receive care.
Health care represents a major share of consumer spending in America, but the amount spent per resident varies considerably by location.
New data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis highlights the differences in per-capita health care spending across the country in 2024.
The map below ranks every state using the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures by State data from the BEA. Figures are reported in current dollars and allocated according to residents’ state of residence.
Which States Spend the Most on Health Care?
Below is a ranking of states based on per-person health care spending:
| Rank | State | Per-Capita Health Care Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | $14,044 |
| 2 | District of Columbia | $13,865 |
| 3 | South Dakota | $12,451 |
| 4 | New York | $12,221 |
| 5 | West Virginia | $12,055 |
| 6 | Delaware | $11,987 |
| 7 | Massachusetts | $11,985 |
| 8 | North Dakota | $11,667 |
| 9 | Vermont | $11,493 |
| 10 | Indiana | $11,071 |
| 11 | California | $11,054 |
| 12 | Maine | $10,913 |
| 13 | New Hampshire | $10,682 |
| 14 | Connecticut | $10,639 |
| 15 | Minnesota | $10,567 |
| 16 | New Jersey | $10,468 |
| 17 | Pennsylvania | $10,262 |
| 18 | Ohio | $10,202 |
| 19 | Nebraska | $10,192 |
| 20 | Louisiana | $10,148 |
| 21 | Wisconsin | $10,079 |
| 22 | Missouri | $10,036 |
| 23 | Kentucky | $9,964 |
| 24 | Oregon | $9,931 |
| 25 | Illinois | $9,895 |
| 26 | Rhode Island | $9,864 |
| 27 | Hawaii | $9,808 |
| 28 | Montana | $9,747 |
| 29 | Washington | $9,693 |
| 30 | Wyoming | $9,640 |
| 31 | Florida | $9,545 |
| 32 | Maryland | $9,456 |
| 33 | Virginia | $9,123 |
| 34 | Kansas | $9,066 |
| 35 | Oklahoma | $9,052 |
| 36 | Michigan | $9,023 |
| 37 | Colorado | $8,871 |
| 38 | Tennessee | $8,761 |
| 39 | North Carolina | $8,744 |
| 40 | Georgia | $8,680 |
| 41 | Iowa | $8,660 |
| 42 | Arkansas | $8,562 |
| 43 | Arizona | $8,556 |
| 44 | New Mexico | $8,469 |
| 45 | Mississippi | $8,135 |
| 46 | Idaho | $8,078 |
| 47 | Alabama | $7,980 |
| 48 | Texas | $7,807 |
| 49 | South Carolina | $7,741 |
| 50 | Nevada | $7,536 |
| 51 | Utah | $7,233 |
Alaska spent nearly twice as much per resident on health care as Utah in 2024.
Several Northeastern states, along with South Dakota and Washington, D.C., also ranked near the top. Meanwhile, much of the Mountain West and South recorded below-average spending.
Why Do Some States Spend More Than Others?
Higher spending does not necessarily mean residents receive more medical care.
Numerous studies have found that differences in prices, especially for hospital and physician services, explain much more of the variation in U.S. health spending than differences in how often people use care. Administrative costs, provider wages, and regional labor markets also play major roles.
State-specific factors matter as well. Alaska’s remote geography and limited provider network make delivering care significantly more expensive, while states with older populations often spend more because seniors tend to use more medical services.
Broader insurance coverage can also increase the share of care captured in personal consumption expenditures.
Health Care Spending Continues to Climb
Nationally, health care expenditures continue to rise.
CMS projects U.S. health spending will approach $9 trillion annually by 2034, driven by increased enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid, along with continued growth in health care prices. Despite already spending more per person than any comparable high-income country, the U.S. is expected to devote an even larger share of its economy to health care over the next decade.
International comparisons show the U.S. spends substantially more on health care than other high-income countries, largely because medical services cost more rather than because Americans use dramatically more care.
As national spending continues to rise, the nearly twofold gap between states highlights how geography remains a major factor in what Americans ultimately spend on health care.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed this visualization, check out Americans Pay More for Healthcare, Yet Have Shorter Life Expectancy on the Voronoi app, where you can discover thousands of data-driven charts from trusted sources covering health, economics, markets, and more.
Popular
-
China2 weeks agoRanked: The World’s Best Countries at Math in 2026
-
Countries4 weeks agoRanked: The Best and Worst Countries to Live In 2026
-
Debt1 week agoRanked: Countries With the Most Government Debt Per Person
-
Jobs4 days agoMapped: The Best Employer in Every U.S. State
-
Housing3 weeks agoRanked: 100 Global Cities by Quality of Life and Cost
-
Brands3 weeks agoRanked: Cars That Hold and Lose Their Value the Most
-
Money3 weeks agoRanked: Countries With the Highest Debt-to-GDP Ratios
-
Urbanization1 week agoRanked: The World’s Strongest City Economies by 2050
