Ranked: Americans’ Favorite News Sites
Published
Design
See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.
Save to Inbox
Ranked: Americans’ Favorite News Sites
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key Takeaways
- BBC News has the highest approval rating among Americans at 51%.
- No other news website reaches 50% positive opinion among respondents.
- Yahoo News (48%) ranks second and is the top U.S.-based brand.
Americans get their news online from a wide mix of sources, including legacy newspapers, cable networks, digital platforms, and sports media brands.
This graphic ranks the 20 news websites with the highest positive opinion among Americans, based on YouGov polling from the fourth quarter of 2025. The results highlight a fragmented media landscape, with many well-known outlets clustered closely together in approval ratings.
London Surprises At The Top
Despite surveying American audiences, the top-ranked news website is BBC News, with 51% of respondents expressing a positive opinion.
The BBC is the United Kingdom’s public broadcaster. Founded in 1922, it has grown into one of the largest global news organizations.
The table below ranks the 20 news sites with the highest approval among Americans.
| Rank | News site | Share of people with a positive opinion about the news website |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BBC News | 51% |
| 2 | Yahoo! | 48% |
| 3 | ESPN | 43% |
| 4 | NBC | 42% |
| 5 | NBC News | 42% |
| 6 | The New York Times | 41% |
| 7 | Forbes | 39% |
| 8 | CNN | 39% |
| 9 | CBS | 39% |
| 10 | MSN | 39% |
| 11 | NPR | 38% |
| 12 | Fox News | 38% |
| 13 | CNBC | 38% |
| 14 | Reuters | 35% |
| 15 | The Washington Post | 34% |
| 16 | Buzzfeed | 32% |
| 17 | NFL.com | 31% |
| 18 | Politico | 31% |
| 19 | Today.com | 30% |
| 20 | Business Insider | 30% |
BBC stands out as the only news website to surpass the 50% approval mark. No American outlet achieves the same level of broad popularity among respondents.
One possible explanation is distance from U.S. politics. As an international broadcaster, the BBC may avoid some of the domestic partisan divisions faced by American news organizations.
The Strong Domestic Contenders
Following BBC, 48% of Americans express a positive view of Yahoo News, making it the second-ranked site overall and the top U.S.-based brand.
Although Yahoo was founded in 1996, it only began producing original journalism in 2011. Before that, it primarily functioned as a news aggregator, republishing stories from other outlets—an approach that helped it build a large and familiar audience.
Further down the ranking, sports media brand ESPN (43%) outranks the newspaper of record, The New York Times (41%). The result highlights the broad appeal of sports coverage compared with more politically focused news.
The Cable News Kings Online
The Times is not the only major brand that ranks lower than expected in online popularity.
Well-known television networks such as CNN (39%) and Fox News (38%) have large cable audiences but receive more modest approval ratings among Americans online.
Growing political polarization in the U.S., along with ongoing debates over media bias, may help explain why these outlets generate more divided public opinion.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Ranked: The 20 Most Visited Websites in the World in 2026 on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
You may also like
-
Mapped: Average Student Debt by State in 2026
-
Mapped: The Average Wedding Cost in Every U.S. State
-
Ranked: Which Countries Rely Most on U.S. Trade
-
Mapped: America’s Top Employment Sector by State (1990 vs. 2025)
-
Ranked: The Best and Worst Countries to Live In 2026
-
Mapped: Every U.S. State’s Economy, Matched to a Country
Mapped: Does Your State Trade More With China or the EU?
The European Union has emerged as an unexpected beneficiary of rising trade tensions between the U.S. and China.
Published
September 30, 2026 9:52 am
Does Your State Trade More With China or the EU?
Key Takeaways
- All but five U.S. states traded more with the European Union than China in 2025.
- China accounted for 13% of California’s goods trade, the highest share among the five China-oriented states.
- Alaska, Illinois, Oregon, and Wyoming shifted to trading more with the EU than China in 2025.
China and the European Union are two of America’s biggest trading partners, but their influence looks very different from state to state.
This U.S. map highlights which states trade more with China versus the European Union, using 2025 data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Only goods trade is included; trade in services is excluded.
A Trade War on Two Fronts
Within months of the start of President Donald Trump’s second term, the U.S. announced sweeping tariffs on dozens of economies, including major trading partners such as China and the EU.
The U.S. initially announced a 34% reciprocal tariff on Chinese goods in April 2025, which was later raised above 100% amid retaliatory measures before being reduced. Against that backdrop, U.S.-China trade fell 29% from the previous year.
The table below lists U.S. states based on whether they traded more with China or the EU in 2025.
| State | Trades More With (2025) | EU-to-China Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.6 |
| Alaska | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.6 |
| Arizona | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.0 |
| Arkansas | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.1 |
| California | 🇨🇳 China | 0.8 |
| Colorado | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.5 |
| Connecticut | 🇪🇺 EU | 6.0 |
| Delaware | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.2 |
| D.C. | 🇪🇺 EU | 27.2 |
| Florida | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.6 |
| Georgia | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.6 |
| Hawaii | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.5 |
| Idaho | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.1 |
| Illinois | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.6 |
| Indiana | 🇪🇺 EU | 8.6 |
| Iowa | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.4 |
| Kansas | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.8 |
| Kentucky | 🇪🇺 EU | 4.3 |
| Louisiana | 🇪🇺 EU | 7.7 |
| Maine | 🇪🇺 EU | 5.1 |
| Maryland | 🇪🇺 EU | 7.0 |
| Massachusetts | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.9 |
| Michigan | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.9 |
| Minnesota | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.2 |
| Mississippi | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.0 |
| Missouri | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.6 |
| Montana | 🇪🇺 EU | 4.0 |
| Nebraska | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.7 |
| Nevada | 🇨🇳 China | 0.7 |
| New Hampshire | 🇪🇺 EU | 8.2 |
| New Jersey | 🇪🇺 EU | 4.1 |
| New Mexico | 🇨🇳 China | 0.3 |
| New York | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.3 |
| North Carolina | 🇪🇺 EU | 5.0 |
| North Dakota | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.3 |
| Ohio | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.4 |
| Oklahoma | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.2 |
| Oregon | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.1 |
| Pennsylvania | 🇪🇺 EU | 4.4 |
| Rhode Island | 🇪🇺 EU | 10.2 |
| South Carolina | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.9 |
| South Dakota | 🇨🇳 China | 0.9 |
| Tennessee | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.2 |
| Texas | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.7 |
| Utah | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.4 |
| Vermont | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.0 |
| Virginia | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.7 |
| Washington | 🇨🇳 China | 0.7 |
| West Virginia | 🇪🇺 EU | 3.4 |
| Wisconsin | 🇪🇺 EU | 2.2 |
| Wyoming | 🇪🇺 EU | 1.8 |
Four states shifted to trading more with the EU than China in 2025: Alaska, Illinois, Oregon, and Wyoming. They joined 41 other states and Washington, D.C., in the EU-oriented group.
With Illinois switching sides, every state east of the Mississippi River now trades more with the EU than with China.
How EU Trade Gained Ground
The EU was also subject to the so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs, initially facing a 20% reciprocal tariff. Following negotiations between the U.S. and European Commission, the two sides announced a trade deal in July 2025 that capped most U.S. tariffs on EU goods at 15%.
Over the full year, U.S.-China goods trade declined by more than a quarter, while total EU-U.S. trade increased from 2024.
The states trading the most with the EU were Texas ($114 billion), Indiana ($110 billion), and California ($67 billion). Indiana stands out in particular, with the EU accounting for about half of its goods trade, supported by the state’s large pharmaceutical industry and companies such as Eli Lilly.
The Five States Still Oriented Toward China
Only California, Nevada, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Washington traded more with China than with the European Union in 2025.
California led by a wide margin, recording more than $86 billion in two-way goods trade with China.
The five states have distinct industries that help explain their trade ties with China. These include California’s port-driven electronics imports, aerospace exports from Washington, and semiconductor production in New Mexico.
Learn More on the Voronoi App
To see how transatlantic trade ties are expanding, check out Revitalized U.S. Role in EU Trade since the Mid-2010s on Voronoi.
Mapped: How U.S.-China Trade Changed by U.S. State
Trade with China fell in 49 of 50 U.S. states in 2025. Only New Mexico grew, lifted by a surge in electronics exports.
Published
September 30, 2026 6:49 am
How U.S.-China Trade Shifted Across the States
Key Takeaways
- New Mexico was the only state whose trade with China grew in 2025, rising 27% on a surge in electronics exports that include computer chips.
- Every other state traded less with China, led by Louisiana (down 64%) and Wyoming (down 58%).
- California lost the most in dollar terms, $52.2 billion, as its imports from China fell by 38%.
U.S. goods trade with China fell 29% in 2025, from $583.6 billion to $414.6 billion, amid a year of sharply higher tariffs and shifting trade flows.
This map shows the change in each state’s goods trade with China from 2024 to 2025, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Trade is the sum of a state’s exports to and imports from mainland China, in current U.S. dollars. Exports are credited to the state where a shipment begins its journey to the port, which is not always where the goods were produced.
Trade With China Fell in 49 of 50 States
The size of the decline varied widely, from 7.6% in North Carolina to 64.3% in Louisiana. Overall, 22 states lost at least a quarter of their goods trade value with China.
The table below ranks all 50 states by the percentage change in their goods trade with China from 2024 to 2025, along with each year’s trade value:
| State | 2024 (Goods traded, $B) | 2025 (Goods traded, $B) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | 3.9 | 4.9 | 27.2 |
| North Carolina | 13.0 | 12.0 | -7.6 |
| Indiana | 14.3 | 12.7 | -11.2 |
| Rhode Island | 0.7 | 0.6 | -12.1 |
| Utah | 3.8 | 3.3 | -13.0 |
| Oklahoma | 2.8 | 2.5 | -13.0 |
| South Dakota | 0.4 | 0.3 | -13.3 |
| New Hampshire | 0.9 | 0.8 | -14.7 |
| Minnesota | 8.7 | 7.4 | -14.7 |
| Idaho | 0.5 | 0.4 | -15.2 |
| Kentucky | 11.0 | 9.3 | -15.6 |
| Iowa | 2.2 | 1.9 | -15.9 |
| Ohio | 13.2 | 11.1 | -16.1 |
| Michigan | 11.0 | 9.1 | -17.1 |
| Missouri | 4.9 | 4.0 | -18.5 |
| Oregon | 8.5 | 6.9 | -19.0 |
| Arkansas | 1.3 | 1.0 | -19.3 |
| North Dakota | 0.2 | 0.2 | -19.4 |
| Mississippi | 3.6 | 2.8 | -20.4 |
| Delaware | 1.2 | 1.0 | -21.1 |
| Wisconsin | 7.9 | 6.2 | -21.2 |
| Maine | 0.3 | 0.2 | -22.0 |
| West Virginia | 0.6 | 0.5 | -22.3 |
| Florida | 14.3 | 11.0 | -22.7 |
| Colorado | 2.6 | 2.0 | -23.4 |
| Nevada | 5.8 | 4.4 | -23.6 |
| Vermont | 0.3 | 0.2 | -23.9 |
| Georgia | 21.0 | 15.9 | -24.2 |
| New Jersey | 16.4 | 12.3 | -25.3 |
| Massachusetts | 7.3 | 5.4 | -25.4 |
| South Carolina | 12.6 | 9.4 | -25.5 |
| Virginia | 7.1 | 5.2 | -26.3 |
| Connecticut | 2.8 | 2.1 | -26.5 |
| Texas | 58.7 | 42.5 | -27.6 |
| New York | 21.6 | 15.6 | -27.6 |
| Kansas | 2.3 | 1.7 | -28.0 |
| Washington | 23.1 | 16.5 | -28.6 |
| Nebraska | 1.4 | 1.0 | -29.0 |
| Hawaii | 0.3 | 0.2 | -29.1 |
| Maryland | 3.8 | 2.7 | -29.5 |
| Tennessee | 24.4 | 15.6 | -36.1 |
| Montana | 0.2 | 0.1 | -36.5 |
| Pennsylvania | 20.0 | 12.6 | -36.8 |
| California | 138.5 | 86.3 | -37.7 |
| Arizona | 7.1 | 4.4 | -37.9 |
| Alabama | 8.2 | 4.9 | -41.1 |
| Illinois | 46.7 | 26.3 | -43.7 |
| Alaska | 1.6 | 0.9 | -46.4 |
| Wyoming | 0.3 | 0.1 | -57.5 |
| Louisiana | 11.2 | 4.0 | -64.3 |
| 🇺🇸 U.S. Total | 583.6 | 414.6 | -29.0 |
Figures may not sum due to rounding.
Most of the lost dollars came from imports. Nationally, imports from China fell by $132 billion, compared with a $37 billion decline in exports, meaning nearly four-fifths of the decrease in trade value came from lower imports. California and Illinois alone accounted for about half of that import decline.
The steepest percentage drops tell a different story. In Louisiana, Wyoming, and Alaska, the three biggest decliners, trade fell mainly because exports to China dropped.
New Mexico was the lone exception, driven by a surge in electronics exports.
Why New Mexico Went the Other Way
New Mexico’s trade with China rose 27% to $4.9 billion, and a single category explains the gain: exports of electrical machinery and electronics, which include computer chips, climbed 69% to $3.0 billion.
That trade barely existed a few years ago. New Mexico shipped only about $20 million of these goods to China annually in 2022 and 2023, before exports jumped to $1.8 billion in 2024. That same year, Intel opened Fab 9, an advanced chip-packaging plant in Rio Rancho.
The growth also held up through the tariff war. China reportedly exempted some U.S.-made chips from its 125% tariff in April 2025, although it did not publicly confirm the move.
China accounted for 18% of New Mexico’s goods trade in 2025, making it the most China-reliant state.
Louisiana’s Soybean and Fuel Exports to China Collapsed
At the other end of the map, Louisiana lost $7.2 billion in trade with China, and almost all of it came from exports, which fell 71%. Soybean shipments dropped from $5.9 billion to $2.1 billion, while fuel exports fell from $3.2 billion to $0.3 billion.
Both were among the first targets of China’s retaliation. Beijing added tariffs on U.S. coal, LNG, and crude oil in February 2025 and on soybeans in March, before raising its tariff on all U.S. goods to 125% in April. The U.S. shipped virtually no soybeans to China from June through August, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation.
Much of that loss belongs to farmers upriver. Grain from across the Midwest moves down the Mississippi River to export terminals near New Orleans, and Census credits it to Louisiana, where the shipments are consolidated. Louisiana itself harvested 55 million bushels of soybeans in 2024, a fraction of the 474 million bushels it was credited with shipping to China.
As the Census Bureau notes, this methodology can overstate exports from port states and understate them from the states where the goods were produced, meaning the map may understate how hard the trade downturn hit parts of the Farm Belt.
Learn More on the Voronoi App
To learn more about how tariffs affected the U.S.-China trade relationship, check out this graphic on Voronoi.
Popular
-
China2 weeks agoRanked: The World’s Best Countries at Math in 2026
-
Countries4 weeks agoRanked: The Best and Worst Countries to Live In 2026
-
Economy1 week agoRanked: Countries With the Most Government Debt Per Person
-
Maps4 days agoMapped: The Best Employer in Every U.S. State
-
Money3 weeks agoRanked: 100 Global Cities by Quality of Life and Cost
-
Brands3 weeks agoRanked: Cars That Hold and Lose Their Value the Most
-
Economy3 weeks agoRanked: Countries With the Highest Debt-to-GDP Ratios
-
Urbanization1 week agoRanked: The World’s Strongest City Economies by 2050
