Connect with us
Money

Ranked: The States Where Education Pays Off Most

Published

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

Double-ranked bar chart showing the share of college graduates by state and the median household income by state.

  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • Reddit
  • Telegram
Use This Visualization Add as preferred on Google

Ranked: The States Where Education Pays Off Most

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Washington D.C. leads the nation in education and income, with 66% of adults holding a bachelorโ€™s degree and median household income topping $109,000.
  • States with the highest shares of college graduates generally report the highest household incomes, highlighting the economic value of educational attainment.
  • Alaska stands out as a major exception, earning nearly $96,000 per household despite a relatively low share of college graduates.

A college degree remains one of the strongest predictors of income in America, but the relationship varies considerably across states.

This graphic compares the share of adults with a bachelorโ€™s degree against median household income across all 50 states and Washington D.C., using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. In many states, higher educational attainment coincides with significantly higher household earnings, helping explain why some regions consistently rank near the top for prosperity.

Among the top 10 income states, the average bachelorโ€™s degree attainment rate is roughly 44%, compared with about 29% among the bottom 10 states.

At the same time, several states outperform or underperform what education levels alone might suggest, revealing the role that industry mix, labor demand, and local economic strengths play in shaping incomes.

How Do Education and Income Vary Across America?

The table below shows where Americans are most educated and how much households earn. Educational attainment data is as of 2023, while median household incomes are as of 2024.

Rank (Income)StateShare of College GradsMedian Household Income
1District of Columbia66%$109,707
2Massachusetts48%$104,828
3New Jersey44%$104,294
4Maryland44%$102,905
5Hawaii37%$100,745
6California38%$100,149
7New Hampshire41%$99,782
8Washington41%$99,389
9Colorado46%$97,113
10Utah38%$96,658
11Connecticut43%$96,049
12Alaska32%$95,665
13Virginia42%$92,090
14Delaware37%$87,534
15Minnesota40%$87,117
16New York41%$85,820
17Oregon38%$85,220
18Rhode Island39%$83,504
19Illinois38%$83,211
20Vermont44%$82,730
21Arizona34%$81,486
22Idaho32%$81,166
23Nevada29%$81,134
24Georgia35%$79,991
25Texas34%$79,721
26North Dakota34%$77,871
27Florida35%$77,735
28Pennsylvania35%$77,545
29Wisconsin34%$77,488
30South Dakota33%$76,881
31Maine37%$76,442
32Nebraska35%$76,376
33Wyoming30%$75,532
34Kansas36%$75,514
35Iowa32%$75,501
36Montana35%$75,340
37North Carolina37%$73,958
38Michigan33%$72,389
39South Carolina33%$72,350
40Ohio32%$72,212
41Tennessee32%$71,997
42Indiana30%$71,959
43Missouri33%$71,589
44New Mexico32%$67,816
45Alabama29%$66,659
46Oklahoma29%$66,148
47Kentucky28%$64,526
48Arkansas26%$62,106
49Louisiana27%$60,986
50West Virginia24%$60,798
51Mississippi26%$59,127

Where Education Delivers the Biggest Income Advantage

Across the U.S., states with larger shares of college graduates tend to report higher household incomes. Among the highest-income states, bachelorโ€™s degree attainment often exceeds 40%, while many lower-income states have college graduate shares below 30%.

The pattern suggests that educational attainment remains closely linked to household prosperity, even as local economic conditions continue to influence outcomes.

Massachusetts, New Jersey, Colorado, and Washington rank near the top on both measures. These states are home to high-paying industries such as technology, finance, healthcare, and professional services, which attract and reward highly educated workers.

Meanwhile, states with lower educational attainment generally report lower household incomes, reinforcing the long-established connection between education and earnings. The gap is particularly notable in several Southern states, where education rates can be up to 20 percentage points lower than those at the top.

Nationally, bachelorโ€™s degree holders earn about $13,000 more than the median worker, with California seeing the highest wage premium of $23,732 and Wyoming seeing one of the lowest, at $4,051.

When Education Isnโ€™t the Whole Story

While educational attainment helps explain income differences across much of the country, several states challenge the trend.

Alaska is among the most notable examples. Despite ranking well below many top-income states in college graduate share, its median household income approaches $96,000. High-paying jobs in energy, transportation, and resource industries help support earnings that exceed what education levels alone might predict.

At the other end of the spectrum, some highly educated states generate lower incomes than peers with similar graduation rates. For example, Vermontโ€™s 44% grad rate matches New Jersey and Maryland, yet its median income lags $20,000 behind, demonstrating that workforce composition and industry mix remain critical pieces of the equation.

Together, these outliers show that education is only one piece of the economic puzzle.

Why the Degree Advantage Is Evolving

For decades, earning a degree was one of the clearest paths to higher income.

While that relationship remains strong, advances in artificial intelligence and ongoing shifts in the labor market are changing the outlook for many knowledge-based occupations.

As a result, future economic success may depend not only on educational attainment, but also on how effectively states connect skilled workers with industries that have strong labor demand.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the worldโ€™s most educated countries.

GDP

Ranked: The Worldโ€™s Most and Least Taxed Countries

Some countries collect over 40% of GDP in taxes. Others collect less than 2%. See how countries around the world compare.

Published

Graphic showing countries ranked by the percentage of government revenue which comes from taxes.

How Countries Compare on Tax Revenue

Key Takeaways

  • Denmark collects tax revenue equal to 45.3% of GDP, the highest globally, and more than twice the 19.5% collected in the U.S.
  • Seven of the 10 countries with the highest tax-revenue shares are in Europe.
  • Several oil-rich economies rank near the bottom, where resource revenues can reduce reliance on conventional taxes.

Tax revenue varies dramatically around the world, reflecting differences in tax systems, economic development, and other sources of government income.

Using the latest data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), this graphic compares tax revenue as a share of GDP across countries in 2024.

Compare your country with its peers in the final table on this page.

Where Governments Rely Most on Taxes

Among wealthy economies, the differences are substantial. Denmark collects tax revenue equal to 45.3% of GDP, versus roughly 29% in Canada and Australia and just 19.5% in the United States.

RankCountryTax Revenue as % of GDP (2024)
1๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark45.3%
2๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria38.8%
3๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden38.7%
4๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia35.3%
5๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland33.4%
6๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand32.6%
7๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway31.3%
8๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Eswatini30.7%
9๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg30.7%
10๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland30.4%
11๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy29.6%
12๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium29.6%
13๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada29.5%
14๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia29.4%
15๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro29.0%
16๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France28.7%
17๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง UK28.5%
18๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria28.3%
19๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece27.8%
20๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados27.8%

These differences partly reflect how countries structure their tax systems and fund public services.

Nordic countries generally have broad tax bases that help finance extensive public programs, while the U.S. relies more heavily on private spending in areas such as healthcare and retirement.

The Worldโ€™s Least Taxed Countries

At the other end of the ranking, oil-rich economies sit alongside some of the worldโ€™s poorest countries. Both collect relatively little in taxes, but for very different reasons.

RankCountryTax Revenue as a % of GDP (2024)
1๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya1.2%
2๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait1.4%
3๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq1.7%
4๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Yemen2.0%
5๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan2.0%
6๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia2.2%
7๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria3.4%
8๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar3.8%
9๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain4.4%
10๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman4.5%
11๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan4.8%
12๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡น Haiti5.0%
13๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran5.2%
14๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea5.5%
15๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola5.6%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar5.6%
17๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ Brunei6.1%
18๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น Ethiopia6.2%
19๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Sierra Leone6.4%
20๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama6.7%

For major oil producers, natural resources provide an alternative source of government revenue. Kuwait collects just 1.4% of GDP in taxes, while Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman are all below 5%.

In lower-income countries, low tax collections can instead reflect large informal economies and limited tax-collection capacity. Similar tax levels can therefore result from resource wealth in one country and difficulty raising revenue in another.

Americaโ€™s Growing Tax and Spending Gap

The U.S. occupies an interesting position in the global comparison. Its tax take is lower than that of many other advanced economies, while federal spending is projected to remain substantially higher than federal revenues.

In 2026, federal spending is projected at 23.3% of GDP, versus revenues of 17.5%. By 2036, those figures are projected to reach 24.4% and 17.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, net interest is projected to more than double to $2.1 trillion, nearly matching all federal discretionary spending.

This leaves a persistent gap between what the federal government collects and what it spends, while a growing share of the budget goes toward servicing past borrowing.

Tax Revenue Around the World

Countriesโ€™ tax revenues vary based on development levels, institutional capacity, tax systems, and resource wealth. The table below lists countries worldwide by tax revenue as a percentage of GDP in 2024.

CountryTax Revenue as % of GDP (2024)
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan10.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania19.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Algeria9.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra15.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola5.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Antigua and Barbuda15.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina22.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Armenia22.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ผ Aruba21.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia29.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria28.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan17.8%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain4.4%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh7.4%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados27.8%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus27.2%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium29.6%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ Belize23.2%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin13.2%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan10.8%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia17.8%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina22.6%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana22.4%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil25.6%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ Brunei Darussalam6.1%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria38.8%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso18.8%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ Burundi12.1%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ป Cabo Verde19.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia12.5%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon12.7%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada29.5%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ซ Central African Republic7.8%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฉ Chad7.4%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile19.6%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China13.0%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia23.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Comoros8.9%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica13.2%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Cote d'Ivoire13.6%
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia27.2%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus25.3%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech Republic18.9%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ DR Congo9.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark45.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฏ Djibouti11.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Dominica22.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Dominican Republic14.5%
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador13.6%
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt11.7%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador21.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea5.5%
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia22.9%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Eswatini30.7%
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น Ethiopia6.2%
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฏ Fiji22.3%
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland30.4%
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France28.7%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Gabon13.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia24.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany23.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana13.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece27.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Grenada23.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala11.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guinea12.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ผ Guinea-Bissau8.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ Guyana8.2%
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡น Haiti5.0%
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras17.5%
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong SAR14.2%
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary24.7%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland33.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India18.1%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia10.1%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran5.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq1.7%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland20.5%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel24.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy29.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica25.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan20.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan15.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan16.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Kenya12.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Kiribati17.5%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Korea13.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Kosovo27.1%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait1.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyz Republic21.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Lao P.D.R12.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia22.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon10.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ธ Lesotho23.5%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท Liberia11.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya1.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Liechenstein14.5%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania22.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg30.7%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ด Macao SAR25.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Madagascar11.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi14.1%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia12.5%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป Maldives24.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Mali15.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น Malta23.1%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ญ Marshall Islands13.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ท Mauritania15.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ Mauritius23.1%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico15.7%
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Micronesia16.5%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova21.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia23.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro29.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Morocco20.8%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mozambique20.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar5.6%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia35.3%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ท Nauru19.4%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal16.4%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands26.5%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand32.6%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Nicaragua20.9%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช Niger6.9%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria3.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ North Macedonia18.9%
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway31.3%
๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman4.5%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan9.9%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ผ Palau21.7%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama6.7%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ Papua New Guinea12.1%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay11.4%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru14.3%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines15.4%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland22.2%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal24.9%
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar3.8%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of Congo10.6%
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania16.4%
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia19.2%
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda13.8%
๐Ÿ‡ผ๐Ÿ‡ธ Samoa24.1%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ San Marino17.6%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡น Sao Tome and Principe10.8%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia7.2%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ณ Senegal18.2%
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia23.5%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ Seychelles27.4%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ Sierra Leone6.4%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore14.3%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovak Republic19.6%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia21.5%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ง Solomon Islands21.4%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia2.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa25.2%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan4.8%
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain23.9%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka12.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ณ St. Kitts and Nevis15.2%
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡จ St. Lucia19.7%
๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡จ St. Vincent and the Grenadines23.6%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan2.0%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ท Suriname18.9%
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden38.7%
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland20.0%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ Tajikistan17.1%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania11.9%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand16.0%
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ The Bahamas17.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฒ The Gambia11.1%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ Timor-Leste9.1%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo14.9%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ด Tonga22.0%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago21.9%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia25.3%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฒ Turkmenistan11.9%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ป Tuvalu17.0%
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Tรผrkiye16.6%
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช UAE18.2%
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda12.9%
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine27.4%
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom28.5%
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States19.5%
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay18.2%
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan13.6%
๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡บ Vanuatu13.9%
๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam13.0%
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ West Bank and Gaza25.6%
๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Yemen2.0%
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia17.3%
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe11.6%

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic breaking down income tax revenue by wealth bracket in America.

Continue Reading
Technology

Ranked: The 10 Youngest U.S. Billionaires on the Forbes 400

Americaโ€™s youngest billionaires are increasingly tied to AI, with seven of the top 10 building fortunes in the industry.

Published

Ranked: The 10 Youngest U.S. Billionaires on the Forbes 400

Key Takeaways

  • Seven of Americaโ€™s 10 youngest Forbes 400 billionaires built their fortunes in AI.
  • Anthropic accounts for four of the 10, with their combined fortunes totaling an estimated $62 billion.
  • Nine of the 10 are self-made, but the lone heir, Lukas Walton, is the richest at $44.4 billion.

Artificial intelligence isnโ€™t just creating some of Americaโ€™s most valuable startups. Itโ€™s also creating a new generation of billionaires.

The 2026 Forbes 400 includes founders and executives behind Anthropic, OpenAI, Surge AI, and Cognition among its youngest members, highlighting how quickly AI wealth has risen into the upper ranks of Americaโ€™s richest people.

This visualization ranks the 10 youngest members of the Forbes 400 by age and shows the companies behind their fortunes.

Net worth figures are as of Sept. 4, 2026, and a fortune of at least $4.4 billion was required to make this yearโ€™s Forbes 400.

How AI Is Reshaping Americaโ€™s Youngest Billionaires

The youngest person in the group is 30-year-old Steven Hao, cofounder of AI coding company Cognition, with an estimated fortune of $5.8 billion.

At the other end of the ranking, several billionaires are 39 years old, including Walmart heir Lukas Walton and Anthropic cofounders Daniela Amodei and Tom Brown.

NameAgeNet Worth (Billions)Source of Wealth:
Steven Hao30$5.8BCognition
Palmer Luckey33$5.9BAnduril
Sam McCandlish36$15.5BAnthropic
Jack Clark37$15.5BAnthropic
Greg Brockman38$25.5BOpenAI
Edwin Chen38$18.0BSurge AI
Daniela Amodei39$15.5BAnthropic
Tom Brown39$15.5BAnthropic
Vlad Tenev39$7.1BRobinhood
Lukas Walton39$44.4BWalmart

Seven names on the list made their fortunes in AI. The remaining fortunes come from Walmart, fintech company Robinhood, and defense technology company Anduril.

Four Anthropic Cofounders Are Worth $15.5 Billion Each

Anthropic accounts for four of the 10 youngest billionaires: Sam McCandlish, Jack Clark, Daniela Amodei, and Tom Brown.

Forbes estimates that each holds a stake worth $15.5 billion, putting their combined fortunes at roughly $62 billion. The four range in age from 36 to 39.

Other AI fortunes include OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman, whose estimated net worth stands at $25.5 billion, Surge AI founder Edwin Chen at $18 billion, and Cognition cofounder Steven Hao at $5.8 billion.

Most of These Fortunes Are Tied to Private Companies

Another defining feature of the ranking is how much of the wealth comes from private companies. Eight of the 10 fortunes are based on private-company stakes valued using recent funding rounds, according to the source note accompanying the Forbes data.

Unlike public stocks, private companies donโ€™t have continuously traded market prices. New funding rounds can reset company valuations and significantly change the estimated paper wealth of major shareholders.

That dynamic is especially important for privately held AI companies, where rising valuations have created multibillion-dollar fortunes well before many of these businesses have reached the public markets.

The Only Heir Is Also the Richest

For all the new wealth being created in technology, the richest person in the ranking represents a much older source of billionaire wealth.

NameSource of Wealth: Self-made or inherited
Steven HaoCognitionSelf-made
Palmer LuckeyAndurilSelf-made
Sam McCandlishAnthropicSelf-made
Jack ClarkAnthropicSelf-made
Greg BrockmanOpenAISelf-made
Edwin ChenSurge AISelf-made
Daniela AmodeiAnthropicSelf-made
Tom BrownAnthropicSelf-made
Vlad TenevRobinhoodSelf-made
Lukas WaltonWalmartInherited

At 39, Lukas Walton has an estimated net worth of $44.4 billion stemming from retail giant Walmart. He is the only person among the 10 whose fortune is identified as inherited.

His fortune also stands above every individual AI billionaire shown.

The ranking captures two very different paths to extreme wealth within the same generation: a decades-old retail fortune at the top and a wave of newer fortunes built around some of the worldโ€™s fastest-growing technology companies.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed todayโ€™s post, check out The Worldโ€™s Richest Person Every Year Since 1987 on Voronoi, the app from Visual Capitalist.

Continue Reading

Popular