8

Why were the disciples sent "two by two" by Jesus? I read it might have to do with cultural Jewish tradition of "two witnesses" being needed or desirable to corroborate a fact, or to convict. Is there any explanation for this?

And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits; [Mark 6:7 KJV]

3
  • 1
    Welcome to SE-BH. Please see the Tour and Help (below, left) as to the purpose and functioning of the site. Good question. Up-voted +1. I have edited only to indicate how text is highlighted. Please feel free to roll back, if you wish. Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 20:17
  • Thank you Nigel! Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 21:22
  • Glad to be of service. Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 21:28

4 Answers 4

7

Mark 6:7 New International Version

Calling the Twelve to him, he began to send them out two by two and gave them authority over impure spirits.

According to Jewish law, they need at least 2 persons to testify and agree. So if their hearers object, they have the required number of persons present to affirm the truthfulness of a statement.

Deuteronomy 19:15

One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.

John 8:17

Even in your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid.

Furthermore, the two can check on each other and support and encourage each other. They are mutually accountable to each other and to reduce the number of temptations

The formula works well as Jesus did the same on another occasion in Luke 10:1

After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them two by two ahead of him to every town and place where he was about to go.

0
0

The devil can fool one, but never both at same time! It ensures nothing flakey occurs that would desecrate the holy mission at hand!

1
  • As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please edit to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center. Commented Apr 17, 2025 at 0:16
0

It takes at least two if not for safety, or for the checks and balances to survive the unforeseen. Without this, and in the remainder of the text, it's this strength that as failsafe will bring the good news to an encounter. By the time of Acts, the apostles were quite sure of why they might go about in numbers.

The ethic Jesus prescribes for those sent forth establishes self-reliance between coequals, and in the event of the poverty they were given, the apostles yet evinced an understanding and a gentle mastery of a lifestyle that would eventually win over Rome.

Their poverty caught the imagination of observers, even if pooling of funds were recorded precisely because it was the exception, and total commonality in all practiced only at times by rule of conduct.

  • Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture 827a
0

Jesus said in Matthew 18:20 (NASB) “For where two or three have gathered together in My name, there I am in their midst.”

The scriptures give us insight of His spiritual presence at the calling upon of His name when He later sent out the 70 disciples with the same authority He had given the apostles. Luke 10:17 (NASB) says ... And the seventy returned with joy, saying, "Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name.” To which Jesus immediately responded (verse 18 Youngs Literal Translation) "I was beholding the Adversary, as lightning from the heaven having fallen."

Jesus is here using the way lightning flashes in the sky as an analogy of how His spiritual presence was called to the site of the disciples at the calling upon of His name and thus it was He Himself who confronted the demon. It is not saying that Satan was cast out of heaven at this time.

This understanding of how this incident is a testimony of His spiritual presence being invoked at the calling upon of His name remains hidden from most to this very day, it is a phenomenon which He attests to in Luke 10:21 (NASB) which reads.... At that very time He rejoiced greatly in the Holy Spirit, and said, “I praise Thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that Thou didst hide these things from the wise and intelligent and didst reveal them to babes. Yes, Father, for thus it was well-pleasing in Thy sight.

This is a hidden gem in the scriptures but there is also another underlying hidden gem in this story that is found in the answer to the question "Why did He not also grant them authority at this time to baptize in His name?"

The answer is that during the Lord's earthly ministry every baptism was performed in His physical presence with Him acting in the official capacity of bearing witness the baptism for the remission of sin.

Since He was standing right there in the flesh it was not necessary to call upon His name as an invocation of His presence to witness the baptism during His earthly ministry. And thus the revelation of calling upon of the Name for the Lord's spiritual presence remained hidden until the Day of Pentecost.

It was His choice that this should remain a hidden gem until the time He had appointed when (as promised) by the mouth of Peter the "keys to the kingdom of heaven" were unveiled when he said "Repent and be baptized in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

1
  • I would add that "two witnesses confirm a matter", and that the animals entered the ark of Noah two by two, so Christ gathers his people into the ark of heaven two by two. Commented Apr 8, 2025 at 16:09

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.