Skip to main content

Questions tagged [electroweak]

Electroweak stands for the unification of the electromagnetism and the weak force. The unification energy scale is around 100~200 GeV, the mass scale of the Higgs boson. It is widely accepted to be formulated as a quantum field theory with gauge symmetries of U(1) symmetry in electromagnet forces and SU(2) flavor symmetry in weak forces.

-7 votes
0 answers
67 views

The W and Z boson masses in units of the neutral pion mass (PDG 2025) are: mW / mπ = 595.43 and mZ / mπ = 675.58 Their ratio gives sin²θW = 1 − (595/675)² = 0.22299, within 0.30σ of the measured on-...
Blackguard-6's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
64 views

In the theory of the electroweak force, a classic example of the Higgs mechanism, the Lagrangian is given by $$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2g^2}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + (D_\mu\phi)^\dagger D^\mu \phi+\mu^2\...
Leuca Patmore's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
150 views

Due to the weak coupling with light particles, it’s very difficult to study Higgs boson in the $s$-channel like what we did on $Z$ boson. Nevertheless, there is a lot of interest to study the “Higgs ...
哲煜黄's user avatar
  • 2,867
0 votes
0 answers
152 views

Here is a typical $s$-channel reaction. An electron and a positron collide at 91 GeV and merge into a $Z$ boson, which quickly decays into a pair of muons. However, such a reaction can occur at much ...
哲煜黄's user avatar
  • 2,867
1 vote
2 answers
213 views

This question is about something from page 162 of Physics from Symmetry by Schwichtenberg (second edition). The doublet is an electroweak $SU(2)$, say a left-handed neutrino and left-handed electron. ...
D. Apple's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
178 views

After the discovery of Higgs boson at LHC, multiple lepton colliders like FCC-ee, ILC, CLIC, and muon colliders were proposed. These colliders can produce Higgs bosons under very clean backgrounds to ...
哲煜黄's user avatar
  • 2,867
0 votes
1 answer
121 views

As the title suggests I am trying to show this invariance. But before I do that I will explain what the crux of the problem, for me, is. This post might be a bit lengthy, but I believe it is necessary ...
imbAF's user avatar
  • 2,100
0 votes
1 answer
123 views

When Peskin tries to calculate the mass terms for the gauge fields (page 701) for the following expression : $$\Delta\mathcal L=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\nu^2}{4}(g^2(A^1_\mu)^2+g^2(A^2_\mu)^2 + (-gA^3_\mu + ...
imbAF's user avatar
  • 2,100
-1 votes
1 answer
87 views

Peskin starts his treatment of SSB (spontaneously symmetry breaking) by considering a non-abelian example. He considers an $SU(2)$ gauge field coupled to a scalar field $\phi$ that transforms as a ...
imbAF's user avatar
  • 2,100
7 votes
1 answer
857 views

A summary of my understanding: The electron is conventionally assigned a parity of $+1$. From Dirac theory it then follows that the positron has parity $-1$. Parity anticommutes with momentum, so that ...
my2cts's user avatar
  • 28.7k
-1 votes
1 answer
265 views

I am confused when it comes to the relation between some arbitrary gauge transformation/ internal symmetry and the different symmetries considered. I will illustrate this by considering the $SU(2)$ ...
imbAF's user avatar
  • 2,100
0 votes
1 answer
183 views

I have recently been concerned with the production and detection of $W^{\pm}$ and $Z^0$ bosons. As it is well known, the literature is often unclear about virtual/real particles, so let me premise ...
Feynmate's user avatar
  • 2,257
3 votes
0 answers
144 views

Since these are so short-lived, I'm assuming spin cannot be determined "traditionally" through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus. Are $W$ and $Z$ assumed to have integer spin because the theory ...
artfuldodger's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
50 views

I was studying this graph: (Source) I was wondering why there is such a big difference in the branching ratio of $H \to WW$ and $H \to ZZ$. I know that for the Higgs mass of $125\,\text{GeV}$ both ...
RoTheory73's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
309 views

I am trying to reproduce the results found in R. Jackiw, S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 5 (1972). The following loop integral is the only one that is giving the wrong result: $$ \require{cancel} \...
gammamatrix's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
29