Connect with us
Education

Girls Outscore Boys in Reading in 89 of 90 Education Systems

Published

Gender gap in teen reading scores by country based on OECD PISA 2025 results
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • Reddit
  • Telegram
Use This Visualization Add as preferred on Google

Where Is the Reading Gender Gap the Widest?

Key Takeaways:

  • Girls recorded higher mean reading scores than boys in 89 of the 90 education systems tested in PISA 2025.
  • Rwanda was the only education system where boys recorded a higher mean reading score than girls, leading by six points.
  • The OECD-wide reading gap widened by five points from 2022 to 2025, largely because boys’ scores fell more sharply.

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) measures how well 15-year-olds can apply reading, mathematics, and science skills to real-world challenges. Its latest results show a wide gender gap in reading performance.

How Big Is the Reading Gap Between Girls and Boys?

The table below shows mean reading scores by gender from the OECD’s PISA 2025 Results.

Country/EconomyGirls
(Avg. score)
Boys
(Avg. score)
Difference
(Girls - Boys)
🇸🇬 Singapore54852226
🇨🇳 B-S-J-Z (China)5305237
🇹🇼 Chinese Taipei52848939
🇰🇷 Korea51548728
🇳🇿 New Zealand*51448033
🇲🇴 Macao (China)51349022
🇪🇪 Estonia51248725
🇯🇵 Japan51049614
🇮🇪 Ireland51049119
🇦🇺 Australia50747531
🇬🇧 United Kingdom50148814
🇨🇦 Canada*50147922
🇺🇸 United States*50147724
🇵🇱 Poland50046337
🇫🇮 Finland49845246
🇮🇹 Italy48846028
🇸🇪 Sweden48744741
🇭🇰 Hong Kong (China)48647412
🇱🇹 Lithuania48644244
🇨🇭 Switzerland48545431
🇨🇿 Czechia48445431
🇧🇪 Belgium48345033
🇹🇷 Türkiye48246022
🇦🇹 Austria48045426
🇵🇹 Portugal47944533
🇩🇪 Germany47845325
🇭🇷 Croatia47743047
🇩🇰 Denmark47644531
🇫🇷 France47344132
🇳🇴 Norway*47343439
🇸🇮 Slovenia47142052
🇸🇰 Slovak Republic46642937
🇪🇸 Spain46443926
🇭🇺 Hungary46244220
🇳🇱 Netherlands*45942435
🇱🇺 Luxembourg45842930
🇮🇱 Israel45541738
🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates45141437
🇱🇻 Latvia45040942
🇨🇱 Chile44642521
🇬🇷 Greece44640046
🇲🇪 Montenegro44039941
🇮🇸 Iceland43940831
🇧🇳 Brunei Darussalam43841425
🇶🇦 Qatar43839840
🇲🇹 Malta43839247
🇺🇾 Uruguay43641125
🇷🇸 Serbia43539540
🇺🇦 Ukrainian regions (17 of 27)43440232
🇷🇴 Romania42939930
🇨🇷 Costa Rica42340914
🇦🇱 Albania*42339132
🇲🇩 Moldova42338538
🇧🇷 Brazil41939721
🇲🇺 Mauritius41539520
🇲🇽 Mexico41440212
🇧🇬 Bulgaria41236449
🇨🇴 Colombia40739116
🇹🇭 Thailand40637630
🇬🇪 Georgia40636442
🇻🇳 Viet Nam40437925
🇲🇾 Malaysia40338222
🇨🇾 Cyprus40135744
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia40037426
🇵🇪 Peru39938217
🇰🇿 Kazakhstan39837227
🇦🇷 Argentina3943859
🇪🇨 Ecuador39437618
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan39235636
🇲🇳 Mongolia39035831
🇵🇭 Philippines38035427
🇯🇴 Jordan37934633
🇮🇩 Indonesia37735324
🇸🇻 El Salvador37535817
🇵🇸 Palestinian Authority37431956
🇲🇰 North Macedonia37334231
🇹🇯 Dushanbe (Tajikistan)3723648
🇦🇲 Armenia36832740
🇵🇾 Paraguay36134318
🇩🇴 Dominican Republic36033030
🇰🇬 Kyrgyzstan35833127
🇽🇰 Kosovo35832235
🇰🇭 Cambodia35533817
🇬🇹 Guatemala3423339
🇱🇧 Lebanon33532610
🇲🇦 Morocco32931317
🇮🇶 Kurdistan Region (Iraq)32829533
🇿🇲 Zambia3263242
🇰🇪 Kenya3223193
🇷🇼 Rwanda298304-6
🌐 OECD average47644630

*Indicates low school and student participation, with rates falling below international standards.

Rwanda was the lone system where boys posted a higher mean score, leading by six points. Girls had higher mean scores in the other 89 systems, although the differences in Kenya and Zambia were not statistically significant. The largest gaps favoring girls reached 45 points or more in seven systems.

Among OECD countries, 37% of boys failed to reach baseline reading proficiency, compared with 25% of girls. At the top end, 7% of girls and 5% of boys reached Level 5 or higher.

These differences emerge well before age 15: multicountry research has found a female reading advantage in early primary grades, while U.S. research has observed gaps from fourth grade onward.

Why Does the Reading Gap Persist?

Engagement may be part of the picture. UNESCO reports that boys tend to express less enjoyment of and confidence in reading, while UK research similarly finds lower reading enjoyment among boys. These patterns suggest the gap cannot be reduced to ability alone.

Recent declines have also been steeper among boys. From 2022 to 2025, boys’ OECD-average reading scores fell 17 points, compared with a 12-point decline for girls, widening the gender gap by five points.

The divide also provides context for later educational patterns, with stark differences emerging in women’s and men’s participation in higher education. Reading proficiency can influence access to further education and, in turn, earning prospects in the workforce.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

Explore The Largest Gender Pay Gaps in OECD Countries to see how gender differences appear later in the labor market.

Education

How Asia Took Over the Global Math Rankings (2003-2025)

The best countries at math have shifted since 2003, with Asian economies now occupying all seven top spots in PISA.

Published

How the Global Math Leaderboard Has Changed

Key Takeaways

  • In 2003, just three of the seven highest-scoring economies in PISA mathematics were in Asia. By 2025, all seven were Asian economies.
  • Several former leaders, including Finland, the Netherlands, and Canada, have fallen substantially from their 2003 positions.
  • The United States remains well outside the group of top-performing economies in mathematics.

The global landscape for math achievement has shifted significantly over the past two decades.

This visualization compares Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) mathematics scores for 15-year-olds in 2003 and 2025. PISA measures how well 15-year-old students can apply their knowledge and skills to real-world problems.

The Top Scorers in Math in 2003

In 2003, the highest-performing education systems included a mix of European, Asia-Pacific, and North American economies.

Country / Economy2003 PISA ScoreRegion
🇭🇰 Hong Kong 550Asia
🇫🇮 Finland544Europe
🇰🇷 South Korea542Asia
🇳🇱 Netherlands538Europe
🇱🇮 Liechtenstein536Europe
🇯🇵 Japan534Asia
🇨🇦 Canada532North America
🇧🇪 Belgium529Europe
🇲🇴 Macao 527Asia
🇨🇭 Switzerland527Europe
🇦🇺 Australia524Oceania
🇳🇿 New Zealand523Oceania
🇨🇿 Czechia516Europe
🇮🇸 Iceland515Europe
🇩🇰 Denmark514Europe
🇫🇷 France511Europe
🇸🇪 Sweden509Europe
🇦🇹 Austria506Europe
🇩🇪 Germany503Europe
🇮🇪 Ireland503Europe
🇸🇰 Slovakia498Europe
🇳🇴 Norway495Europe
🇱🇺 Luxembourg493Europe
🇭🇺 Hungary490Europe
🇵🇱 Poland490Europe
🇪🇸 Spain485Europe
🇱🇻 Latvia483Europe
🇺🇸 United States483North America
🇷🇺 Russia468Europe
🇮🇹 Italy466Europe

Hong Kong led the participating economies in mathematics with an average score of 550, followed by Finland at 544 and South Korea at 542. The Netherlands, Liechtenstein, Japan, and Canada completed the top seven.

How the Ranking Shifted by 2025

By 2025, every economy in the top seven was located in Asia.

Country / Economy2025 PISA ScoreRegion
🇨🇳 China612Asia
🇸🇬 Singapore563Asia
🇲🇴 Macao549Asia
🇹🇼 Taiwan546Asia
🇯🇵 Japan525Asia
🇰🇷 South Korea522Asia
🇭🇰 Hong Kong522Asia
🇪🇪 Estonia508Europe
🇨🇭 Switzerland499Europe
🇬🇧 UK488Europe
🇨🇦 Canada485North America
🇵🇱 Poland484Europe
🇳🇱 Netherlands483Europe
🇳🇿 New Zealand480Oceania
🇮🇪 Ireland480Europe
🇧🇪 Belgium480Europe
🇦🇺 Australia478Oceania
🇦🇹 Austria477Europe
🇨🇿 Czechia477Europe
🇩🇰 Denmark471Europe
🇱🇹 Lithuania470Europe
🇫🇮 Finland469Europe
🇸🇰 Slovakia469Europe
🇮🇹 Italy468Europe
🇩🇪 Germany464Europe
🇸🇪 Sweden464Europe
🇺🇸 United States463North America
🇹🇷 Türkiye462Asia
🇸🇮 Slovenia460Europe
🇵🇹 Portugal460Europe

China, representing Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, recorded the highest mathematics score at 612, while Singapore followed at 563. Across OECD countries as a whole, the average mathematics score stood at 463 in 2025.

Former Leaders Lose Ground

Several countries that ranked near the top in 2003 have moved down considerably.

Finland, which scored 544 in mathematics in 2003, recorded 469 in 2025.

Canada’s score fell from 532 to 485, while the Netherlands declined from 538 to 483.

The United States remains well outside the group of top-performing economies in mathematics. While American students perform more strongly in reading and science, math has historically been a weaker area in PISA assessments.

Math Scores Are Falling More Broadly

OECD data shows that the broader decline is continuing: average mathematics performance across 35 OECD countries fell another nine points between 2022 and 2025.

On a longer timeline, average mathematics scores fell by 22 points between 2015 and 2025, which the OECD estimates is equivalent to just over one year of learning.

PISA also found an association between heavy digital leisure use and student outcomes. Students spending more than four hours a day on digital leisure activities outside school tended to have lower mathematics scores and a weaker sense of belonging.

By contrast, moderate digital use was associated with better outcomes on both measures than either no use or very high use.

China’s Result Comes With an Important Caveat

China’s 2025 result does not represent the entire mainland Chinese student population.

The reported score covers Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang. These jurisdictions recorded an average mathematics score of 612, the highest in PISA 2025.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Countries by Education Spending as % of GDP on Voronoi.

Continue Reading
Personal Finance

Mapped: Average Student Debt by State in 2026

Washington, D.C. may have high salaries, but the average borrower has more student debt there than anywhere else.

Published

Map showing the average student debt by borrower across different states in 2026.

How Student Debt Varies Across the U.S.

Key Takeaways

  • Nationally, the average borrower in the U.S. owes roughly $38,000 in student debt.
  • Borrowers in Washington, D.C., have the highest average federal student debt in the country, at $55,846.
  • Student debt is lowest in North Dakota ($30,543) and across much of the Great Plains.

Student debt can follow borrowers long after graduation, with balances shaped by factors ranging from education levels to where borrowers live.

This map shows average federal student loan debt per borrower using Federal Student Aid figures as of March 2026, compiled via the Education Data Initiative. Balances include principal and interest but exclude private student loans.

Where Student Loan Balances Are Highest

More than 40 million individuals, or about one in six American adults, have student debt today. Total federal student loan debt has surpassed $1.8 trillion, making it roughly comparable to the size of South Korea’s economy.

Washington, D.C., stands apart with an average balance of $55,846. Maryland, in a distant second, has the highest average among the 50 states at $45,589, followed by Georgia ($43,813), Virginia ($41,916), and Florida ($41,162).

The following data table ranks states by their average federal debt per borrower.

RankState (+DC)Avg. Federal Debt per Borrower ($)
1District of Columbia55,846
2Maryland45,589
3Georgia43,813
4Virginia41,916
5Florida41,162
6Illinois40,774
7New York40,666
8Delaware40,639
9Hawaii40,496
10North Carolina40,455
11South Carolina40,138
12California39,980
13Oregon39,499
14New Jersey39,174
15Alabama39,157
16Mississippi39,009
17Colorado38,844
18Vermont38,770
19Tennessee38,664
20Michigan38,626
21Connecticut38,417
22Washington38,139
23Pennsylvania37,542
24Alaska37,209
25Arizona37,114
26Massachusetts37,086
27Missouri37,024
28Ohio36,311
29New Hampshire36,228
30Louisiana36,167
31Maine35,906
32Nevada35,879
33Montana35,601
34Minnesota35,594
35Arkansas35,504
36Utah35,429
37New Mexico35,398
38Kentucky35,088
39Texas35,014
40Idaho34,642
41Kansas34,537
42Indiana34,502
43Rhode Island34,068
44Wisconsin33,846
45West Virginia33,728
46Nebraska33,676
47Oklahoma33,483
48Wyoming32,847
49Iowa31,885
50South Dakota31,705
51North Dakota30,543

States in the country’s interior tend to have lower student debt averages. North Dakota ($30,543) is lowest nationwide, followed by South Dakota ($31,705) and Iowa ($31,885).

Geography can be misleading, however, because these figures are based on a borrower’s state of residence rather than the location of the college they attended. A state’s position therefore reflects the debt carried by people living there, not simply the tuition charged by local universities.

Why D.C. Stands Out

The nation’s capital has an average balance roughly $10,000 higher than the nearest state. One likely factor is D.C.’s high concentration of advanced-degree holders. The District leads the nation in higher education, including graduate education, as well as income, supported in part by high-paying government-adjacent private-sector jobs.

Two-thirds of adults in D.C. have a bachelor’s degree, while more than a third of residents aged 25 and older hold a graduate or professional degree. Meanwhile, median household income tops $109,000, well ahead of any state.

Graduate education, including master’s degrees and law school, can add another layer of borrowing after a bachelor’s degree. Borrowers with more education are more likely to carry larger student loan balances, meaning D.C.’s outlier figure may partly reflect its highly educated population and greater exposure to graduate-school borrowing.

Bigger Balances, Bigger Paychecks?

The D.C. example points to a broader consideration: loan size is only one part of the repayment challenge. Income, employment, and degree completion also matter.

Borrowers with less education are more likely to fall behind on student loan payments, even though they have often taken out less debt than those with more advanced degrees. A smaller loan can still be difficult to repay without the earnings that a completed degree may help provide.

This is important context given that more than 40% of students who attend college never graduate. That leaves millions of Americans carrying student debt without the potential earnings benefit of a completed degree.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To explore which degrees are associated with the most debt, check out Ranked: Median Student Debt for a U.S. College Degree on Voronoi.

Continue Reading

Popular